Literature DB >> 20469032

The electric speaking practice: a telephone workload study.

R C Westbury.   

Abstract

The telephone workload in a family practice was studied for two recording periods separated by a 12 month interval. A record was kept of the number of calls, their length, the day of the week on which they were made, to whom they were made, and for what purpose.The telephone practice accounts for about 20 percent of the total practice workload. Calls to the patients and to their representatives were about equally common and account for most of the workload, but a large amount of telephone work is devoted to 'backing up' these direct contacts. The use of the telephone for medical purposes saves much time for the patients and much money for the paying agency. A plea is made for intensive study of this aspect of family medicine.

Entities:  

Year:  1974        PMID: 20469032      PMCID: PMC2274064     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Fam Physician        ISSN: 0008-350X            Impact factor:   3.275


  9 in total

1.  Doctor/Patient contacts in family practice-an exploratory study.

Authors:  R Steele; A S Kraus; P M Smith
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1968-09       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  The work of a group of doctors in Saskatchewan.

Authors:  S Wolfe; R F Badgley; R V Kasius; J Z Garson; R J Gold
Journal:  Milbank Mem Fund Q       Date:  1968-01

3.  Use of the telephone by low-income families.

Authors:  M C Heagarty; L Robertson; J Kosa; J J Alpert
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1968-11       Impact factor: 4.406

4.  General pediatrics: a study of practice in the mid-1960's.

Authors:  S J Hessel; R J Haggerty
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1968-08       Impact factor: 4.406

5.  Concerning A. G. Bell's invention.

Authors:  G S Sturtz; R B Brown
Journal:  Clin Pediatr (Phila)       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 1.168

6.  Availability and attentiveness: are these compatible in pediatric practice? An evaluation of office visits, 'phone calls and a parent questionnaire as they relate to changes in the office management of children.

Authors:  C Hercules; E Charney
Journal:  Clin Pediatr (Phila)       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 1.168

7.  Morbidity in family practice.

Authors:  A H McFarlane; B P O'Connell
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1969-09-06       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  A study of family medicine in upstate New York.

Authors:  G J Riley; C R Wille; R J Haggerty
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1969-06-23       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Time-motion study of practicing pediatricians.

Authors:  A B Bergman; S W Dassel; R J Wedgwood
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1966-08       Impact factor: 7.124

  9 in total
  5 in total

1.  A study of family physicians' telephone accessibility.

Authors:  N H McAlister; C Tong
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  The role of the family physician in hospital part 2: use of hospital privileges.

Authors:  M A Johnston; T Tweedie; J N Premi; P E Shea
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Family practice nurses and the telephone.

Authors:  T M Gerace; M C Huffman
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  The telephone in primary care.

Authors:  P Curtis; A Talbot
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  1981

5.  Telephone medicine: a general internal medicine experience.

Authors:  B E Johnson; C A Johnson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1990 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.128

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.