Literature DB >> 20466849

Ventricular dilation and electrical dyssynchrony synergistically increase regional mechanical nonuniformity but not mechanical dyssynchrony: a computational model.

Roy C P Kerckhoffs1, Jeffrey H Omens, Andrew D McCulloch, Lawrence J Mulligan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) in combination with mechanical dyssynchrony is associated with a high mortality rate. To quantify contractile dysfunction in patients with HF, investigators have proposed several indices of mechanical dyssynchrony, including percentile range of time to peak shortening (WTpeak), circumferential uniformity ratio estimate (CURE), and internal stretch fraction (ISF). The goal of this study was to compare the sensitivity of these indices to 4 major abnormalities responsible for cardiac dysfunction in dyssynchronous HF: dilation, negative inotropy, negative lusitropy, and dyssynchronous activation. METHODS AND
RESULTS: All combinations of these 4 major abnormalities were included in 3D computational models of ventricular electromechanics. Compared with a nonfailing heart model, ventricles were dilated, inotropy was reduced, twitch duration was prolonged, and activation sequence was changed from normal to left bundle branch block. In the nonfailing heart, CURE, ISF, and WTpeak were 0.97+/-0.004, 0.010+/-0.002, and 78+/-1 milliseconds, respectively. With dilation alone, CURE decreased 2.0+/-0.07%, ISF increased 58+/-47%, and WTpeak increased 31+/-3%. With dyssynchronous activation alone, CURE decreased 15+/-0.6%, ISF increased 14-fold (+/-3), and WTpeak increased 121+/-4%. With the combination of dilation and dyssynchronous activation, CURE decreased 23+/-0.8%, ISF increased 20-fold (+/-5), and WTpeak increased 147+/-5%.
CONCLUSIONS: Dilation and left bundle branch block combined synergistically decreased regional cardiac function. CURE and ISF were sensitive to this combination, but WTpeak was not. CURE and ISF also reflected the relative nonuniform distribution of regional work better than WTpeak. These findings might explain why CURE and ISF are better predictors of reverse remodeling in cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20466849      PMCID: PMC3050711          DOI: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.109.862144

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Heart Fail        ISSN: 1941-3289            Impact factor:   8.790


  40 in total

1.  Transmural heterogeneity of calcium activity and mechanical function in the canine left ventricle.

Authors:  Jonathan M Cordeiro; Lindsey Greene; Cory Heilmann; Daniel Antzelevitch; Charles Antzelevitch
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2003-12-11       Impact factor: 4.733

2.  Theoretical impact of the injection of material into the myocardium: a finite element model simulation.

Authors:  Samuel T Wall; Joseph C Walker; Kevin E Healy; Mark B Ratcliffe; Julius M Guccione
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-11-27       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Endocardial versus epicardial differences of sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase gene expression in the canine failing myocardium.

Authors:  K Igarashi-Saito; H Tsutsui; M Takahashi; S Kinugawa; K Egashira; A Takeshita
Journal:  Basic Res Cardiol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 17.165

4.  Transmural heterogeneity of Na+-Ca2+ exchange: evidence for differential expression in normal and failing hearts.

Authors:  Wei Xiong; Yanli Tian; Deborah DiSilvestre; Gordon F Tomaselli
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2005-07-07       Impact factor: 17.367

5.  Effect of alteration of left ventricular activation sequence on the left ventricular end-systolic pressure-volume relation in closed-chest dogs.

Authors:  R C Park; W C Little; R A O'Rourke
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 17.367

6.  Relation between regional electrical activation time and subepicardial fiber strain in the canine left ventricle.

Authors:  T Delhaas; T Arts; F W Prinzen; R S Reneman
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 3.657

7.  Pericardial adaptations during chronic cardiac dilation in dogs.

Authors:  G L Freeman; M M LeWinter
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 17.367

8.  Septal rebound stretch reflects the functional substrate to cardiac resynchronization therapy and predicts volumetric and neurohormonal response.

Authors:  Bart W L De Boeck; Arco J Teske; Mathias Meine; Geert E Leenders; Maarten J Cramer; Frits W Prinzen; Pieter A Doevendans
Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 15.534

9.  Systolic improvement and mechanical resynchronization does not require electrical synchrony in the dilated failing heart with left bundle-branch block.

Authors:  Christophe Leclercq; Owen Faris; Richard Tunin; Jennifer Johnson; Ritsuchi Kato; Frank Evans; Julio Spinelli; Henry Halperin; Elliot McVeigh; David A Kass
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Noninvasive electrocardiographic imaging for cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmia.

Authors:  Charulatha Ramanathan; Raja N Ghanem; Ping Jia; Kyungmoo Ryu; Yoram Rudy
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2004-03-14       Impact factor: 53.440

View more
  29 in total

Review 1.  At the heart of computational modelling.

Authors:  S A Niederer; N P Smith
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2012-01-23       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 2.  Multi-scale computational models of familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: genotype to phenotype.

Authors:  Stuart G Campbell; Andrew D McCulloch
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Growth and remodeling of the left ventricle: A case study of myocardial infarction and surgical ventricular restoration.

Authors:  Doron Klepach; Lik Chuan Lee; Jonathan F Wenk; Mark B Ratcliffe; Tarek I Zohdi; Jose A Navia; Ghassan S Kassab; Ellen Kuhl; Julius M Guccione
Journal:  Mech Res Commun       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 2.254

4.  Mechanistic insight into prolonged electromechanical delay in dyssynchronous heart failure: a computational study.

Authors:  Jason Constantino; Yuxuan Hu; Albert C Lardo; Natalia A Trayanova
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2013-08-09       Impact factor: 4.733

5.  Baseline asynchrony, assessed circumferentially using temporal uniformity of strain, besides coincidence between site of latest mechanical activation and presumed left ventricular lead position, predicts favourable prognosis after resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Chiara Cavallino; Elisa Rondano; Andrea Magnani; Lucia Leva; Eugenio Inglese; Gabriele Dell'era; Eraldo Occhetta; Miriam Bortnik; Paolo N Marino
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-06-19       Impact factor: 2.357

6.  Mechanical discoordination increases continuously after the onset of left bundle branch block despite constant electrical dyssynchrony in a computational model of cardiac electromechanics and growth.

Authors:  Roy C P Kerckhoffs; Jeffrey H Omens; Andrew D McCulloch
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 5.214

7.  A framework for biomechanics simulations using four-chamber cardiac models.

Authors:  Arian Jafari; Edward Pszczolkowski; Adarsh Krishnamurthy
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Fibroblast proliferation alters cardiac excitation conduction and contraction: a computational study.

Authors:  He-qing Zhan; Ling Xia; Guo-fa Shou; Yun-liang Zang; Feng Liu; Stuart Crozier
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.066

9.  Electromechanical models of the ventricles.

Authors:  Natalia A Trayanova; Jason Constantino; Viatcheslav Gurev
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 4.733

Review 10.  A computational approach to understanding the cardiac electromechanical activation sequence in the normal and failing heart, with translation to the clinical practice of CRT.

Authors:  Jason Constantino; Yuxuan Hu; Natalia A Trayanova
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 3.667

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.