Literature DB >> 20466827

The impact of the 4 h target on patient care and outcomes in the Emergency Department: an analysis of hospital incidence data.

Jenny V Freeman1, Susan Croft, Sue Cross, Chris Yap, Suzanne Mason.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent government initiatives in the NHS have seen patient care becoming increasingly target-driven. However, the impact of targets, particularly those based on a timeframe, have not been extensively studied, and concerns remain about unintended consequences for patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a 4 h target in the Emergency Department (ED) on patient care and outcomes.
METHODS: The study comprised an interrupted time-series regression analysis of anonymised patient-level data from 580,000 new patient episodes in the ED between April 2000 and Feb 2006. Outcomes were time in ED, time to clinician, mortality, admission and reattendance rates, and number of investigations.
RESULTS: 90% target was associated with reductions in time in department and fewer patients admitted for less than 24 and 48 h, and a slight increase in the number reattending within 7 days. 98% target was associated with levelling-off of time in department and reductions in numbers admitted and reattending within 7 days. Neither target was associated with change in time to clinician. The introduction of a minor injuries unit (MIU) was associated with reductions in time to clinician and percentage not waiting, and increases in number of investigations, percentages admitted, admitted for 24 h and reattendances within 7 days. Mortality was unaffected by either target or MIU.
CONCLUSION: Although time target introduction is associated with changes in patient care, the introduction of a co-located MIU had greater impact.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20466827     DOI: 10.1136/emj.2009.085431

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Med J        ISSN: 1472-0205            Impact factor:   2.740


  8 in total

1.  Overcrowding in emergency department: an international issue.

Authors:  Salvatore Di Somma; Lorenzo Paladino; Louella Vaughan; Irene Lalle; Laura Magrini; Massimo Magnanti
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 3.397

2.  Implementing performance improvement in New Zealand emergency departments: the six hour time target policy national research project protocol.

Authors:  Peter Jones; Linda Chalmers; Susan Wells; Shanthi Ameratunga; Peter Carswell; Toni Ashton; Elana Curtis; Papaarangi Reid; Joanna Stewart; Alana Harper; Tim Tenbensel
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  National targets, process transformation and local consequences in an NHS emergency department (ED): a qualitative study.

Authors:  Paraskevas Vezyridis; Stephen Timmons
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2014-06-13

4.  Who breaches the four-hour emergency department wait time target? A retrospective analysis of 374,000 emergency department attendances between 2008 and 2013 at a type 1 emergency department in England.

Authors:  Niklas Bobrovitz; Daniel S Lasserson; Adam D M Briggs
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2017-11-02

5.  New Zealand's emergency department target - did it reduce ED length of stay, and if so, how and when?

Authors:  Tim Tenbensel; Linda Chalmers; Peter Jones; Sarah Appleton-Dyer; Lisa Walton; Shanthi Ameratunga
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  The impact of Australian healthcare reforms on emergency department time-based process outcomes: An interrupted time series study.

Authors:  Khic-Houy Prang; Rachel Canaway; Marie Bismark; David Dunt; Margaret Kelaher
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Length of stay as quality indicator in emergency departments: analysis of determinants in the German Emergency Department Data Registry (AKTIN registry).

Authors:  Ronny Otto; Sabine Blaschke; Wiebke Schirrmeister; Susanne Drynda; Felix Walcher; Felix Greiner
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 5.472

8.  Six principles to enhance health workforce flexibility.

Authors:  Susan A Nancarrow
Journal:  Hum Resour Health       Date:  2015-04-07
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.