Literature DB >> 20466294

Randomized trial of vaginal prostaglandin E2 versus oxytocin for labor induction in term premature rupture of membranes.

Cigdem Kunt1, Mine Kanat-Pektas, Ayse Nur Cakir Gungor, Raziye Keskin Kurt, Mustafa Ozat, Cavidan Gulerman, Tayfun Gungor, Leyla Mollamahmutoglu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of a prostaglandin E(2) (PGE(2)) vaginal insert with those of oxytocin for labor induction. The present study also examined whether its use reduces the rate of cesarean delivery in term pregnancies with premature rupture of membranes (PROM) and low Bishop scores.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 240 women with singleton pregnancies at >or= 37 weeks, no prior uterine scar, vertex presentations, reactive nonstress tests, PROM for >or= 12 hours and Bishop scores of <or= 6 were randomly assigned to receive either oxytocin or vaginal PGE(2). The primary outcomes were time from induction to delivery and mode of delivery.
RESULTS: The time from labor induction to active labor onset was significantly shorter in the oxytocin group than in the PGE(2) group (4.9 +/- 4.1 vs. 8.5 +/- 3.6 hours; p = 0.02). The time from induction to delivery was also significantly shorter in the oxytocin group (3.4 +/- 1.5 vs. 9.6 +/- 4.7 hours; p = 0.02). Cesarean delivery rates were statistically similar in the oxytocin and PGE(2) groups (18.3 vs. 20.0%; p = 0.81). Neonatal outcomes were comparable in both groups. Comparable results were observed for nulliparous women included in the study population.
CONCLUSION: Oxytocin treatment seems to be superior to vaginal administration of PGE(2) to induce labor in term pregnancies complicated with PROM and unfavorable services. (c) 2010 Taiwan Association of Obstetric & Gynecology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20466294     DOI: 10.1016/S1028-4559(10)60010-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 1028-4559            Impact factor:   1.705


  4 in total

Review 1.  Methods of induction of labour: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ellen L Mozurkewich; Julie L Chilimigras; Deborah R Berman; Uma C Perni; Vivian C Romero; Valerie J King; Kristie L Keeton
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 3.007

2.  Labor induction in term nulliparous women with premature rupture of membranes: oxytocin versus dinoprostone.

Authors:  Nur Gozde Kulhan; Mehmet Kulhan
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 3.318

3.  High proportions of obstetric referrals in Addis Ababa: the case of term premature rupture of membranes.

Authors:  Alemnesh H Mirkuzie; Mitike Molla Sisay; Mulu Muleta Bedane
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2016-01-25

4.  Comparison of Dinoprostone and Oxytocin for the Induction of Labor in Late-Term Pregnancy and the Rate of Cesarean Section: A Retrospective Study in Ten Centers in South China.

Authors:  Yanxing Wei; Xueyuan Li; Yinhui Zhang; Yuewen Guo; Baomin Yin; Dunjin Chen; Yi Chen; Yanping Yu; Bin Zhu; Yiwei Qin; Jianping Zhang; Zhijian Wang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2019-11-13
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.