Literature DB >> 20466224

Risk of venous thromboembolism in patients with borderline quantitative D-dimer levels.

Taku Taira1, Breena R Taira, Matt Carmen, Jasmine Chohan, Adam J Singer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The lower threshold for D-dimer in evaluating patients with low clinical risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) ranges from 200 to 500 ng/mL. We compared the rates of VTE in patients based on D-dimer values. We hypothesized that the rate of VTE in low-risk patients with D-dimer levels less than 500 would be less than 1%. STUDY
DESIGN: This was a retrospective chart review:
SETTING: The study was performed in a academic, suburban emergency department (ED).
SUBJECTS: Emergency department patients with suspected VTE and D-dimer obtained were included in the study. D-dimer assay: The D-dimer assay is a quantitative instrumentation latex suspension of plasma specimens. OUTCOMES: Presence of VTE within 30 days of ED visit. DATA ANALYSIS: Assuming a 0% event rate in patients with D-dimer levels between 200 and 500 ng/mL, a sample of 450 patients would result in a 95% confidence interval upper limit of 0.6%.
RESULTS: There were 1270 ED patients with suspected VTE in which D-dimer levels were performed between October 2005 and October 2006. Patient mean age was 47.8 +/- 19.3 years; 63.2% were female, 78.2% were white. Of all D-dimer levels, 497 (39.1%) were less than 200 ng/mL, 479 (37.7%) were between 200 and 500 microg/mL, and 294 (23.1%) were greater than 500 ng/mL. There were no VTE events diagnosed in any of the patients with D-dimer levels less than 200 ng/mL. Four patients with D-dimer levels between 200 and 500 microg/mL had a pulmonary embolism on computed tomography angiography. Of these 4 patients, 3 had moderate clinical risk based on Well's criteria and one had a false-positive computed tomography. There were no cases of VTE in the remaining 475 patients (0%; 95% confidence interval 0%-0.6%).
CONCLUSION: The rate of confirmed VTE in low-risk patients with D-dimer levels between 200 and 500 ng/mL is very low. Low-risk patients with suspected VTE with D-dimer levels less than 500 ng/mL might not require additional testing. (c) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20466224     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2009.01.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Emerg Med        ISSN: 0735-6757            Impact factor:   2.469


  5 in total

1.  Coagulation and deep vein flow changes following laparoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: a single-center, prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Chengguang Yang; Leiming Zhu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Preoperative screening of thromboembolism using plasma D-dimer test and proximal vein compression ultrasonography in Japanese gynecologic patients.

Authors:  Daisuke Shigemi; Tomohiko Matsuhashi; Takashi Yamada; Seiryu Kamoi; Toshiyuki Takeshita
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2017-02-13

3.  Significance of preoperative screening of deep vein thrombosis and its indications for patients undergoing urological surgery.

Authors:  Shuichi Tatarano; Hideki Enokida; Masaya Yonemori; Rumiko Eura; Hirofumi Yoshino; Hiroaki Nishimura; Yasutoshi Yamada; Masayuki Nakagawa
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2021-03

4.  Normal D-Dimer Plasma Level in a Case of Acute Thrombosis Involving Intramuscular Gastrocnemius Vein.

Authors:  Hany A Zaki; Amr Elmoheen; Abdallah M Elsafti Elsaeidy; Ahmed E Shaban; Eman E Shaban
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-12-04

Review 5.  Effectiveness of d-dimer as a screening test for venous thromboembolism: an update.

Authors:  Swaroopa Pulivarthi; Murali Krishna Gurram
Journal:  N Am J Med Sci       Date:  2014-10
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.