Literature DB >> 20465918

Initial clinical experience with a new biointegrative cement for vertebroplasty in osteoporotic vertebral fractures.

S Siemund1, L T Nilsson, M Cronqvist, B Strömqvist.   

Abstract

SUMMARY: Polymethylmethacrylate, as a widely used material for vertebroplasty, has several drawbacks such as heat development and high allergenic potential. In order to avoid these drawbacks ceramic cement materials have been developed. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a new biointegrative material for vertebroplasty in osteoporotic vertebral fractures regarding pain relief, safety aspects and technical feasibility. The injectable bone substitute Cerament(TM) SpineSupport has been developed for vertebroplasty of osteoporotic vertebral fractures. The aim of the product is to provide mechanical stability by cured calcium sulfate dehydrate during a period of several weeks and to act as an osteoconductive support by hydroxyl apatite particles. Inclusion criteria were a stable single vertebral fracture at levels Th5 to L5, verified by CT and MRI, and not older than four weeks, in osteoporotic patients aged 60 years or older. Bipedicular vertebroplasty technique was used. Follow up included CT directly after treatment and after two month and pain assessment (VAS) pre and post procedure after two weeks and one month. Seven patients (age range 62 - 96 years, mean 73.9, five women, two men) were treated at levels T 8 (n=1), T 12 (n=4) and L1 (n=2). The average injected volume was 1.9 ml (range 0.2-4 ml). No material or procedure-related complications were observed. An average height loss of the treated vertebral bodies of 3.6 mm (range 1.5-5.4) was seen two months after treatment as compared to pre-treatment CT. Pain assessment by VAS resulted in an improvement from mean 69 prior treatment to 37 the day post treatment, 42 after two weeks and 30 after one month. Initial results indicate that Cerament(TM) SpineSupport is safe and effective in the treatment of acute osteoporotic vertebral body fractures. Further studies with long-term follow-up are needed to confirm these results and to prove the concept of osteoconduction with hydroxyl apatite particles.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 20465918      PMCID: PMC3299381          DOI: 10.1177/159101990901500312

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol        ISSN: 1591-0199            Impact factor:   1.610


  12 in total

Review 1.  Percutaneous vertebroplasty: indications, contraindications, technique, and complications.

Authors:  G Guglielmi; C Andreula; M Muto; L A Gilula
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.990

2.  Position statement on percutaneous vertebral augmentation: a consensus statement developed by the American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology, Society of Interventional Radiology, American Association of Neurological Surgeons/Congress of Neurological Surgeons, and American Society of Spine Radiology.

Authors:  Mary E Jensen; J Kevin McGraw; John F Cardella; Joshua A Hirsch
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.464

3.  The risk of new osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures in the year after percutaneous vertebroplasty.

Authors:  Maurits H J Voormolen; Paul N M Lohle; Job R Juttmann; Yolanda van der Graaf; Hendrik Fransen; Leo E H Lampmann
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.464

Review 4.  Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty: filler materials.

Authors:  Isador H Lieberman; Daisuke Togawa; Mark M Kayanja
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.166

5.  Percutaneous polymethylmethacrylate vertebroplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral body compression fractures: technical aspects.

Authors:  M E Jensen; A J Evans; J M Mathis; D F Kallmes; H J Cloft; J E Dion
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 6.  A review of complications associated with vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty as reported to the Food and Drug Administration medical device related web site.

Authors:  David A Nussbaum; Philippe Gailloud; Kieran Murphy
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.464

7.  Refractures in cemented vertebrae after percutaneous vertebroplasty: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Wei-Che Lin; Yu-Chang Lee; Chen-Hsiang Lee; Yeh-Lin Kuo; Yu-Fan Cheng; Chun-Chung Lui; Tien-Tsai Cheng
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-01-18       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Biodegradation and biocompatability of a calcium sulphate-hydroxyapatite bone substitute.

Authors:  M Nilsson; J S Wang; L Wielanek; K E Tanner; L Lidgren
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-01

9.  Occurrence of new vertebral body fracture after percutaneous vertebroplasty in patients with osteoporosis.

Authors:  Anita A Uppin; Joshua A Hirsch; Luis V Centenera; Bernard A Pfiefer; Artemis G Pazianos; In Sup Choi
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  [Preliminary note on the treatment of vertebral angioma by percutaneous acrylic vertebroplasty].

Authors:  P Galibert; H Deramond; P Rosat; D Le Gars
Journal:  Neurochirurgie       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.553

View more
  1 in total

1.  Bone healing response to a synthetic calcium sulfate/β-tricalcium phosphate graft material in a sheep vertebral body defect model.

Authors:  H L Yang; X S Zhu; L Chen; C M Chen; D C Mangham; L A Coulton; S S Aiken
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 3.368

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.