Literature DB >> 20465407

Active listening impairs visual perception and selectivity: an ERP study of auditory dual-task costs on visual attention.

Elena Gherri1, Martin Eimer.   

Abstract

The ability to drive safely is disrupted by cell phone conversations, and this has been attributed to a diversion of attention from the visual environment. We employed behavioral and ERP measures to study whether the attentive processing of spoken messages is, in itself, sufficient to produce visual-attentional deficits. Participants searched for visual targets defined by a unique feature (Experiment 1) or feature conjunction (Experiment 2), and simultaneously listened to narrated text passages that had to be recalled later (encoding condition), or heard backward-played speech sounds that could be ignored (control condition). Responses to targets were slower in the encoding condition, and ERPs revealed that the visual processing of search arrays and the attentional selection of target stimuli were less efficient in the encoding relative to the control condition. Results demonstrate that the attentional processing of visual information is impaired when concurrent spoken messages are encoded and maintained, in line with cross-modal links in selective attention, but inconsistent with the view that attentional resources are modality-specific. The distraction of visual attention by active listening could contribute to the adverse effects of cell phone use on driving performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20465407     DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21468

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  12 in total

1.  Evaluating reverse speech as a control task with language-related gamma activity on electrocorticography.

Authors:  Erik C Brown; Otto Muzik; Robert Rothermel; Naoyuki Matsuzaki; Csaba Juhász; Aashit K Shah; Marie D Atkinson; Darren Fuerst; Sandeep Mittal; Sandeep Sood; Vaibhav A Diwadkar; Eishi Asano
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Evaluating signal-correlated noise as a control task with language-related gamma activity on electrocorticography.

Authors:  Erik C Brown; Otto Muzik; Robert Rothermel; Csaba Juhász; Aashit K Shah; Darren Fuerst; Sandeep Mittal; Sandeep Sood; Eishi Asano
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  The effects of ongoing distraction on the neural processes underlying signal detection.

Authors:  Elise Demeter; Daniela De Alburquerque; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Brain deactivation in the outperformance in bimodal tasks: an FMRI study.

Authors:  Tzu-Ching Chiang; Keng-Chen Liang; Jyh-Horng Chen; Chao-Hsien Hsieh; Yun-An Huang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Speech rhythms and multiplexed oscillatory sensory coding in the human brain.

Authors:  Joachim Gross; Nienke Hoogenboom; Gregor Thut; Philippe Schyns; Stefano Panzeri; Pascal Belin; Simon Garrod
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 8.029

Review 6.  Neurofeedback Therapy for Enhancing Visual Attention: State-of-the-Art and Challenges.

Authors:  Mehdi Ordikhani-Seyedlar; Mikhail A Lebedev; Helge B D Sorensen; Sadasivan Puthusserypady
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  Driving and Multitasking: The Good, the Bad, and the Dangerous.

Authors:  Menno Nijboer; Jelmer P Borst; Hedderik van Rijn; Niels A Taatgen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-11-08

8.  EEG and Eye Tracking Signatures of Target Encoding during Structured Visual Search.

Authors:  Anne-Marie Brouwer; Maarten A Hogervorst; Bob Oudejans; Anthony J Ries; Jonathan Touryan
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Brain activity during driving with distraction: an immersive fMRI study.

Authors:  Tom A Schweizer; Karen Kan; Yuwen Hung; Fred Tam; Gary Naglie; Simon J Graham
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  The Impact of Task Demands on Fixation-Related Brain Potentials during Guided Search.

Authors:  Anthony J Ries; Jon Touryan; Barry Ahrens; Patrick Connolly
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.