Literature DB >> 20464653

More consistent postoperative care and monitoring can reduce costs following microvascular free flap reconstruction.

Nicholas T Haddock1, Ryan M Gobble, Jamie P Levine.   

Abstract

Great variability exists in microsurgical postoperative care in the United States. Lack of standardized postoperative monitoring protocols and appropriate training of monitoring personnel leads to inefficiency and increased cost of providing microsurgical postoperative care. A 45-question survey was sent to all plastic surgery and plastic surgery-based microsurgery program directors in the United States. Questions focused on the number and type of flaps performed, length of stay, complications, postoperative monitoring setting, training provided to monitoring personnel, and limitations in flap monitoring. The response rate was 31% with 3407 microvascular free flaps performed annually at 26 centers. A total of 1533 flaps were monitored in the intensive care unit (ICU) for an average of 3.1 days. In 45% of responding centers patients were cared for in an ICU secondary to a lack of adequately trained nurses at alternative sites. Printed postoperative protocols were provided to nurses in 39% of centers. With a comparative increase cost of $2878 to $3345 per day for ICU care, this translates into an annual increased cost of $13.7 to $15.9 million to the responding centers. Improved nursing training and the use of standardized postoperative protocols may allow patients to be monitored in non-ICU settings postoperatively, thereby reducing the costs associated with providing postoperative microsurgical care. (c) Thieme Medical Publishers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20464653     DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1254232

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Reconstr Microsurg        ISSN: 0743-684X            Impact factor:   2.873


  4 in total

1.  Multicenter prospective micro-costing study evaluating mandibular free-flap reconstruction.

Authors:  Olivier Dassonville; Alexandre Bozec; Yann Château; Emile Reyt; Bernard Devauchelle; Marie-Yolande Louis; Pierre Breton; Morbize Julieron; Jacques Yachouh; Yann Mallet; Jérôme Sarini; Gilles Dolivet; Renaud Schiappa; Jocelyn Gal; Marie-Helene Orlanducci; Gilles Poissonnet; Emmanuel Chamorey
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Free Flap Reconstruction Monitoring Techniques and Frequency in the Era of Restricted Resident Work Hours.

Authors:  Urjeet A Patel; David Hernandez; Yelizaveta Shnayder; Mark K Wax; Matthew M Hanasono; Joshua Hornig; Tamer A Ghanem; Matthew Old; Ryan S Jackson; Levi G Ledgerwood; Patrik Pipkorn; Lawrence Lin; Adrian Ong; Joshua B Greene; James Bekeny; Yin Yiu; Salem Noureldine; David X Li; Joel Fontanarosa; Evan Greenbaum; Jeremy D Richmon
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 6.223

3.  Proof-of-Concept Studies for Marker-Based Ultrasound Doppler Analysis of Microvascular Anastomoses in a Modified Large Animal Model.

Authors:  Devin Coon; Lei Chen; Emad M Boctor; Jerry L Prince; Branko Bojovic
Journal:  J Reconstr Microsurg       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 2.873

4.  NSQIP as a Predictor of Length of Stay in Patients Undergoing Free Flap Reconstruction.

Authors:  Charles A Riley; Blair M Barton; Claire M Lawlor; David Z Cai; Phoebe E Riley; Edward D McCoul; Christian P Hasney; Brian A Moore
Journal:  OTO Open       Date:  2017-01-18
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.