Literature DB >> 20463641

Renal function, efficacy, and safety of sirolimus and mycophenolate mofetil after short-term calcineurin inhibitor-based quadruple therapy in de novo renal transplant patients: one-year analysis of a randomized multicenter trial.

Markus Guba1, Johann Pratschke, Christian Hugo, Bernhard K Krämer, Constanze Nohr-Westphal, Jens Brockmann, Joachim Andrassy, Petra Reinke, Katharina Pressmar, Oliver Hakenberg, Michael Fischereder, Andreas Pascher, Wolf-Dieter Illner, Bernhard Banas, Karl-Walter Jauch.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: De novo sirolimus in calcineurin inhibitor-free regimens, although potentially useful to improve early renal function, are complicated by various drug-related side effects.
METHODS: We report a prospective open-label, multicenter, randomized trial to evaluate early conversion from a CsA-based to a sirolimus (SRL)-based regimen 10 to 24 days after renal transplantation. Of the 196 patients, 141 patients with a low-to-moderate immunological risk were eligible to be converted to SRL or to continue CsA. All patients received antithymocyte globulin-F single-bolus induction, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids.
RESULTS: The primary endpoint, renal function determined by S-creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate calculated by Nankivell formula at 12 months was significantly better in the SRL group (1.51+/-0.59 vs. 1.87+/-0.98 mg/dL or 64.5+/-25.2 vs. 53.4+/-18.0 mL/min/1.73 m). Patient survival, graft survival, and incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection after conversion were not statistically different. Drug discontinuations were significantly higher in the SRL group (36.2% vs. 19.7%). Significantly, more patients in the SRL group reported acne, aphtous, and temporary hyperlipidemia, whereas cytomegalovirus viremia was significantly decreased (7.3% vs. 28.2%).
CONCLUSIONS: Early conversion to a calcineurin inhibitor-free regimen with SRL in combination with mycophenolate mofetil may be a useful strategy to improve renal function. The identification of appropriate candidates and safe management of SRL-related adverse events will be a key to avoid the high rate of dropouts, which currently limit the broad applicability of this protocol.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20463641     DOI: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181e11798

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  23 in total

Review 1.  Effect of Immunosuppressive Drugs on Humoral Allosensitization after Kidney Transplant.

Authors:  Olivier Thaunat; Alice Koenig; Claire Leibler; Philippe Grimbert
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 10.121

Review 2.  Is it time to give up with calcineurin inhibitors in kidney transplantation?

Authors:  Maurizio Salvadori; Elisabetta Bertoni
Journal:  World J Transplant       Date:  2013-06-24

Review 3.  Calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal or tapering for kidney transplant recipients.

Authors:  Krishna M Karpe; Girish S Talaulikar; Giles D Walters
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-07-21

Review 4.  Roles of mTOR complexes in the kidney: implications for renal disease and transplantation.

Authors:  Daniel Fantus; Natasha M Rogers; Florian Grahammer; Tobias B Huber; Angus W Thomson
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 28.314

5.  Long-term side effects of treatment with mTOR inhibitors in children after renal transplantation.

Authors:  Birgitta Kranz; Anne-Margret Wingen; Udo Vester; Jens König; Peter F Hoyer
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2013-04-13       Impact factor: 3.714

6.  Differential risks for adverse outcomes 3 years after kidney transplantation based on initial immunosuppression regimen: a national study.

Authors:  Vikas R Dharnidharka; Mark A Schnitzler; Jiajing Chen; Daniel C Brennan; David Axelrod; Dorry L Segev; Kenneth B Schechtman; Jie Zheng; Krista L Lentine
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 3.782

7.  Identification and characterization of kidney transplants with good glomerular filtration rate at 1 year but subsequent progressive loss of renal function.

Authors:  Walter D Park; Timothy S Larson; Matthew D Griffin; Mark D Stegall
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 4.939

8.  Cost-effectiveness of modern mTOR inhibitor based immunosuppression compared to the standard of care after renal transplantation in Germany.

Authors:  Jan Steffen Jürgensen; Robert Ikenberg; Roger-Axel Greiner; Volker Hösel
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2014-04-13

Review 9.  CMV and BKPyV Infections in Renal Transplant Recipients Receiving an mTOR Inhibitor-Based Regimen Versus a CNI-Based Regimen: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized, Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Samir G Mallat; Bassem Y Tanios; Houssam S Itani; Tamara Lotfi; Ciaran McMullan; Steven Gabardi; Elie A Akl; Jamil R Azzi
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 8.237

10.  Renal function to 5 years after late conversion of kidney transplant patients to everolimus: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Klemens Budde; Claudia Sommerer; Thomas Rath; Petra Reinke; Hermann Haller; Oliver Witzke; Barbara Suwelack; Daniel Baeumer; Christian Sieder; Martina Porstner; Wolfgang Arns
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 4.393

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.