Literature DB >> 20463162

Detection of Anaplasma marginale and A. phagocytophilum in bovine peripheral blood samples by duplex real-time reverse transcriptase PCR assay.

James B Reinbold1, Johann F Coetzee, Kamesh R Sirigireddy, Roman R Ganta.   

Abstract

Insufficient diagnostic sensitivity and specificity coupled with the potential for cross-reactivity among closely related Anaplasma species has made the accurate determination of infection status problematic. A method for the development of simplex and duplex real-time quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR (qRT-PCR) assays for the detection of A. marginale and A. phagocytophilum 16S rRNA in plasma-free bovine peripheral blood samples is described. The duplex assay was able to detect as few as 100 copies of 16S rRNA of both A. marginale and A. phagocytophilum in the same reaction. The ratio of 16S rRNA to 16S DNA copies for A. marginale was determined to be 117.9:1 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 100.7:1, 135.2:1). Therefore, the detection limit is the minimum infective unit of one A. marginale bacterium. The duplex assay detected nonequivalent molar ratios as high as 100-fold. Additionally, the duplex assay and a competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (cELISA) were used to screen 237 samples collected from herds in which anaplasmosis was endemic. When the cELISA was evaluated by the results of the qRT-PCR, its sensitivity and specificity for the detection of A. marginale infection were found to be 65.2% (95% CI, 55.3%, 75.1%) and 97.3% (95% CI, 94.7%, 99.9%), respectively. A. phagocytophilum infection was not detected in the samples analyzed. One- and two-way receiver operator characteristic curves were constructed in order to recommend the optimum negative cutoff value for the cELISA. Percentages of inhibition of 20 and 15.3% were recommended for the one- and two-way curves, respectively. In conclusion, the duplex real-time qRT-PCR assay is a highly sensitive and specific diagnostic tool for the accurate and precise detection of A. marginale and A. phagocytophilum infections in cattle.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20463162      PMCID: PMC2897487          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.02405-09

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  32 in total

Review 1.  Gene quantification using real-time quantitative PCR: an emerging technology hits the mainstream.

Authors:  David G Ginzinger
Journal:  Exp Hematol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.084

2.  Detection and quantitation of Anaplasma marginale in carrier cattle by using a nucleic acid probe.

Authors:  I S Eriks; G H Palmer; T C McGuire; D R Allred; A F Barbet
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Comparison of iatrogenic transmission of Anaplasma marginale in Holstein steers via needle and needle-free injection techniques.

Authors:  James B Reinbold; Johann F Coetzee; Larry C Hollis; Jason S Nickell; Casey M Riegel; Julia A Christopher; Roman R Ganta
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.156

Review 4.  Comparative anatomy of 16-S-like ribosomal RNA.

Authors:  R R Gutell; B Weiser; C R Woese; H F Noller
Journal:  Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol       Date:  1985

5.  Reorganization of genera in the families Rickettsiaceae and Anaplasmataceae in the order Rickettsiales: unification of some species of Ehrlichia with Anaplasma, Cowdria with Ehrlichia and Ehrlichia with Neorickettsia, descriptions of six new species combinations and designation of Ehrlichia equi and 'HGE agent' as subjective synonyms of Ehrlichia phagocytophila.

Authors:  J S Dumler; A F Barbet; C P Bekker; G A Dasch; G H Palmer; S C Ray; Y Rikihisa; F R Rurangirwa
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.747

Review 6.  Antigens and alternatives for control of Anaplasma marginale infection in cattle.

Authors:  Katherine M Kocan; José de la Fuente; Alberto A Guglielmone; Roy D Meléndez
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 26.132

7.  Multiplex real-time PCR for detection of anaplasma phagocytophilum and Borrelia burgdorferi.

Authors:  Joshua W Courtney; Leah M Kostelnik; Nordin S Zeidner; Robert F Massung
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Conservation of the unique rickettsial rRNA gene arrangement in Anaplasma.

Authors:  Fred R Rurangirwa; Kelly A Brayton; Travis C McGuire; Donald P Knowles; Guy H Palmer
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.747

9.  Modulation of immune responses to bovine herpesvirus-1 in cattle by immunization with a DNA vaccine encoding glycoprotein D as a fusion protein with bovine CD154.

Authors:  Sharmila Manoj; Philip J Griebel; Lorne A Babiuk; Sylvia van Drunen Littel-van den Hurk
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 7.397

10.  Epidemiology and control of anaplasmosis in Australia.

Authors:  R J Rogers; I A Shiels
Journal:  J S Afr Vet Assoc       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 1.474

View more
  12 in total

1.  Sensitivity and specificity of a competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay relative to quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR for detection of Anaplasma marginale and A. phagocytophilum.

Authors:  Pascale Aubry; Julie Paré
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Comparison of iatrogenic transmission of Anaplasma marginale in Holstein steers via needle and needle-free injection techniques.

Authors:  James B Reinbold; Johann F Coetzee; Larry C Hollis; Jason S Nickell; Casey M Riegel; Julia A Christopher; Roman R Ganta
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.156

3.  Active surveillance of Anaplasma marginale in populations of arthropod vectors (Acari: Ixodidae; Diptera: Tabanidae) during and after an outbreak of bovine anaplasmosis in southern Manitoba, Canada.

Authors:  Matthew E M Yunik; Terry D Galloway; L Robbin Lindsay
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 1.310

Review 4.  Anaplasma marginale and Anaplasma phagocytophilum: Rickettsiales pathogens of veterinary and public health significance.

Authors:  Farhan Ahmad Atif
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 2.289

5.  Detection of A. phagocytophilum and E. chaffeensis in patient and mouse blood and ticks by a duplex real-time PCR assay.

Authors:  Tuo Dong; Zhangyi Qu; Lijuan Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Anaplasma marginale and A. phagocytophilum in cattle in Tunisia.

Authors:  Youmna M'ghirbi; Marwa Bèji; Beatriz Oporto; Fatma Khrouf; Ana Hurtado; Ali Bouattour
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 3.876

7.  Transmission Dynamics of Bovine Anaplasmosis in a Cattle Herd.

Authors:  Taylor A Zabel; Folashade B Agusto
Journal:  Interdiscip Perspect Infect Dis       Date:  2018-05-02

8.  Comparison of three nucleic acid-based tests for detecting <i>Anaplasma marginale</i> and <i>Anaplasma centrale</i> in cattle.

Authors:  Mamohale E Chaisi; Janine R Baxter; Paidashe Hove; Chimvwele N Choopa; Marinda C Oosthuizen; Kelly A Brayton; Zamantungwa T H Khumalo; Awelani M Mutshembele; Moses S Mtshali; Nicola E Collins
Journal:  Onderstepoort J Vet Res       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 1.792

9.  Recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA) with lateral flow detection for three Anaplasma species of importance to livestock health.

Authors:  Andrea Salazar; Francisco M Ochoa-Corona; Justin L Talley; Bruce H Noden
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Important hemoprotozoan diseases of livestock: Challenges in current diagnostics and therapeutics: An update.

Authors:  Biswa Ranjan Maharana; Anup Kumar Tewari; Buddhi Chandrasekaran Saravanan; Naduvanahalli Rajanna Sudhakar
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2016-05-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.