Literature DB >> 20463098

Cardiovascular risk factors in patients with uncontrolled and long-term acromegaly: comparison with matched data from the general population and the effect of disease control.

Christian Berg1, Stephan Petersenn, Harald Lahner, Burkhard L Herrmann, Michael Buchfelder, Michael Droste, Günter K Stalla, Christian J Strasburger, Ulla Roggenbuck, Nils Lehmann, Susanne Moebus, Karl-Heinz Jöckel, Stephan Möhlenkamp, Raimund Erbel, Bernhard Saller, Klaus Mann.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Data on cardiovascular risk in acromegaly are scanty and lack a clear correlation to epidemiological data.
OBJECTIVE: Our aim was an evaluation of cardiovascular risk factors in patients with active acromegaly, a calculation of the Framingham risk score (FRS) compared with age- and gender-matched controls of the general population, and an evaluation of the effect of IGF-I normalization. DESIGN AND
SETTING: We conducted a retrospective, comparative study at a university referral center. PATIENTS: A total of 133 patients with acromegaly (65 men, aged 45-74 yr) from the German Pegvisomant Observational Study were matched to 665 controls from the general population. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Risk factors were measured at baseline and after 12 months of treatment with pegvisomant (n=62).
RESULTS: Patients with acromegaly had increased prevalence of hypertension, mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP), history of diabetes mellitus and glycosylated hemoglobin (all P<0.001) and decreased high-density lipoprotein, low-density lipoprotein, and total cholesterol (all P<0.001). FRS was significantly higher in patients with acromegaly compared with controls (P<0.001). At 12 months, systolic BP (P=0.04) and glycosylated hemoglobin (P=0.02) as well as FRS (P=0.005) decreased significantly. IGF-I was normalized in 62% (41 of 62). In these patients, glucose and systolic and diastolic BP was significantly lower than in partially controlled patients.
SUMMARY: We found an increased prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors in acromegalic patients compared with controls. Control of acromegaly led to a significant decrease of FRS, implying a reduced risk for coronary heart disease. This was most significant in those patients who completely normalized their IGF-I levels.
CONCLUSION: Disease control is important to reduce the likelihood for development of coronary heart disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20463098     DOI: 10.1210/jc.2009-2570

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab        ISSN: 0021-972X            Impact factor:   5.958


  38 in total

1.  Changes in metabolic parameters and cardiovascular risk factors after therapeutic control of acromegaly vary with the treatment modality. Data from the Bicêtre cohort, and review of the literature.

Authors:  Claire Briet; Mirela Diana Ilie; Emmanuelle Kuhn; Luigi Maione; Sylvie Brailly-Tabard; Sylvie Salenave; Bertrand Cariou; Philippe Chanson
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 2.  Cardiovascular comorbidities in acromegaly: an update on their diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Ana M Ramos-Leví; Mónica Marazuela
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2017-01-02       Impact factor: 3.633

3.  Plasma proteomic profiles of bovine growth hormone transgenic mice as they age.

Authors:  Juan Ding; Darlene E Berryman; John J Kopchick
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 2.788

4.  Impact of acromegaly treatment on cardiovascular complications.

Authors:  Adriana G Ioachimescu
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 3.633

5.  Procalcitonin can be used as a marker of premature atherosclerosis in acromegaly.

Authors:  H Ozkan; O Celik; E Hatipoglu; F Kantarci; P Kadioglu
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.107

6.  Incidence of myocardial infarction and stroke in acromegaly patients: results from the German Acromegaly Registry.

Authors:  Christof Schöfl; David Petroff; Anke Tönjes; Martin Grussendorf; Michael Droste; Günter Stalla; Cornelia Jaursch-Hancke; Sylvère Störmann; Jochen Schopohl
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 4.107

7.  The incidence and prevalence of acromegaly, a nationwide study from 1955 through 2013.

Authors:  Gudrun Thuridur Hoskuldsdottir; Sigridur Bara Fjalldal; Helga Agusta Sigurjonsdottir
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.107

8.  Cardiovascular events in acromegaly: distinct role of Agatston and Framingham score in the 5-year prediction.

Authors:  Marta Ragonese; Angela Alibrandi; Gianluca Di Bella; Ignazio Salamone; Soraya Puglisi; Oana Ruxandra Cotta; Maria Luisa Torre; Francesco Ferrau; Rosaria Maddalena Ruggeri; Francesco Trimarchi; Salvatore Cannavo
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 3.633

9.  Does pegvisomant treatment expertise improve control of resistant acromegaly? The Italian ACROSTUDY experience.

Authors:  S Cannavo; F Bogazzi; A Colao; L De Marinis; P Maffei; R Gomez; E Graziano; M Monterubbianesi; S Grottoli
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 4.256

10.  Effectiveness and safety of pegvisomant: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational longitudinal studies.

Authors:  Letícia P Leonart; Fernanda S Tonin; Vinicius L Ferreira; Fernando Fernandez-Llimos; Roberto Pontarolo
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2018-08-25       Impact factor: 3.633

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.