Literature DB >> 20462741

Exposure-response analysis of tigecycline in pharmacodynamic simulations using different size inocula of target bacteria.

D Sevillano1, L Aguilar, L Alou, M J Giménez, N González, M Torrico, F Cafini, C Garcia-Rey, N Garcia-Escribano, J Prieto.   

Abstract

This study explored tigecycline exposure-bacterial responses in pharmacodynamic simulations (in vitro kinetic model) using different inocula. One meticillin-resistant vancomycin-heteroresistant Staphylococcus aureus, one Enterococcus faecium and one extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli with equal tigecycline minimum inhibitory concentrations/minimum bactericidal concentrations (MICs/MBCs) (0.12/0.25 microg/mL) were used. A computerised pharmacodynamic bicompartmental model simulated three tigecycline twice-daily dosing regimens over 48h: 50mg (100mg loading dose); 100mg; and 150 mg. Areas under bacterial growth curves were calculated, and differences between the growth curve used as control and the killing curve of bacteria exposed to tigecycline (ABBC) were determined. With standard inocula [ca. 1 x 10(6)colony-forming units (CFU)/mL], linear increases in area under the concentration-time curve (AUC)/MIC (25.6 for 50mg, 53.76 for 100mg and 79.52 for 150 mg) produced linear increases in activity against Gram-positive organisms (mean ABBCs of 120.60, 143.20 and 195.80 log CFU x h/mL for S. aureus and of 95.75, 172.55 and 216.90 log CFUxh/mL for E. faecium, respectively), with the activity of the 150 mg regimen being significantly higher (P<0.01) than that of the other two regimens. ABBCs obtained with the 100mg regimen using standard inocula were similar to those obtained with the 150 mg regimen when using high inocula (ca. 1 x 10(7)CFU/mL). Against E. coli, the highest dosing regimen was required to obtain significant antibacterial activity compared with control (mean ABBCs of 145.75 log CFU x h/mL with standard inocula and 63.33 log CFU x h/mL with high inocula). An increase in tigecycline dosing appears to be an interesting therapeutic option to maximise antibacterial activity owing to its linear pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, especially when severe infections with high bacterial load are suspected. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier B.V. and the International Society of Chemotherapy. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20462741     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2010.03.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents        ISSN: 0924-8579            Impact factor:   5.283


  4 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Considerations of Antibiotics of Last Resort in Treating Gram-Negative Infections in Adult Critically Ill Patients.

Authors:  Mojdeh S Heavner; Kimberly C Claeys; Anne M Masich; Jeffrey P Gonzales
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 3.725

2.  In vitro simulation of in vivo pharmacokinetic model with intravenous administration via flow rate modulation.

Authors:  Yuan-Cheng Chen; Wang Liang; Jia-Li Hu; Gao-Li He; Xiao-Jie Wu; Xiao-Fang Liu; Jing Zhang; Xue-Qian Hu
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 2.745

3.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of nemonoxacin against Streptococcus pneumoniae in an in vitro infection model.

Authors:  Wang Liang; Yuan-cheng Chen; Yu-ran Cao; Xiao-fang Liu; Jun Huang; Jia-li Hu; Miao Zhao; Qing-lan Guo; Shu-jing Zhang; Xiao-jie Wu; De-mei Zhu; Ying-yuan Zhang; Jing Zhang
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  No dose adjustment of tigecycline is necessary during continuous renal replacement therapy: we are not sure.

Authors:  Patrick M Honore; Cristina David; Luc Kugener; Sebastien Redant; Rachid Attou; Andrea Gallerani; David De Bels
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 9.097

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.