BACKGROUND: Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) expression in primary breast cancer predicts tumor cell dissemination to bone marrow, which is a risk factor for recurrence and distant metastasis. "Stem-like" phenotype may be important in cancer metastasis. METHODS: To investigate the role of COX-2 protein in breast cancer stem-like cells, we analyzed it by co-immunofluorescence in tumorospheres derived from the MCF7 estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer cell line. To evaluate COX-2 function we utilized a COX-2 inhibitor in a clonogenicity assay performed with tumorospheres-derived cells. RESULTS: We detected rare cells in tumorospheres (one cell per tumorosphere) with very high COX-2 expression (COX-2(high)). COX-2 transfected MCF7 cells were able to generate long-term tumorospheres culture, even though transfection efficiency was only one in a million cells. We detected expression of OCT4 in some COX-2(high) cells, supporting the hypothesis that these cells could be cancer stem-like cells. It is important that COX-2(high) cells showed less expression of Ki-67 than did neighboring cells, indicating that COX-2(high) cells may be progenitors of tumorospheres. Celecoxib inhibited the growth of tumorosphere cultures and the ability of tumorosphere-derived cells to form colonies in vitro, indicating an active role of COX-2 in these processes. However, 2 μM celecoxib failed to eradicate tumorosphere-initiating cells. Finally, we detected rare COX-2(high) cells among SUM149 inflammatory breast cancer cells growing on plastic in serum-containing medium; the SUM149 cell line produces a very high level of COX-2 protein. CONCLUSION: Our results support a role for COX-2 in stem-like breast cancer cells and suggest a mechanism behind a role for COX-2 in disseminated tumor cells, which are known to exhibit characteristic biomarkers and functional properties of stem-like cells.
BACKGROUND:Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) expression in primary breast cancer predicts tumor cell dissemination to bone marrow, which is a risk factor for recurrence and distant metastasis. "Stem-like" phenotype may be important in cancer metastasis. METHODS: To investigate the role of COX-2 protein in breast cancer stem-like cells, we analyzed it by co-immunofluorescence in tumorospheres derived from the MCF7estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer cell line. To evaluate COX-2 function we utilized a COX-2 inhibitor in a clonogenicity assay performed with tumorospheres-derived cells. RESULTS: We detected rare cells in tumorospheres (one cell per tumorosphere) with very high COX-2 expression (COX-2(high)). COX-2 transfected MCF7 cells were able to generate long-term tumorospheres culture, even though transfection efficiency was only one in a million cells. We detected expression of OCT4 in some COX-2(high) cells, supporting the hypothesis that these cells could be cancer stem-like cells. It is important that COX-2(high) cells showed less expression of Ki-67 than did neighboring cells, indicating that COX-2(high) cells may be progenitors of tumorospheres. Celecoxib inhibited the growth of tumorosphere cultures and the ability of tumorosphere-derived cells to form colonies in vitro, indicating an active role of COX-2 in these processes. However, 2 μM celecoxib failed to eradicate tumorosphere-initiating cells. Finally, we detected rare COX-2(high) cells among SUM149inflammatory breast cancer cells growing on plastic in serum-containing medium; the SUM149 cell line produces a very high level of COX-2 protein. CONCLUSION: Our results support a role for COX-2 in stem-like breast cancer cells and suggest a mechanism behind a role for COX-2 in disseminated tumor cells, which are known to exhibit characteristic biomarkers and functional properties of stem-like cells.
Authors: Gabriela Dontu; Wissam M Abdallah; Jessica M Foley; Kyle W Jackson; Michael F Clarke; Mari J Kawamura; Max S Wicha Journal: Genes Dev Date: 2003-05-15 Impact factor: 11.361
Authors: Muhammad Al-Hajj; Max S Wicha; Adalberto Benito-Hernandez; Sean J Morrison; Michael F Clarke Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2003-03-10 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Stephan Braun; Florian D Vogl; Bjørn Naume; Wolfgang Janni; Michael P Osborne; R Charles Coombes; Günter Schlimok; Ingo J Diel; Bernd Gerber; Gerhard Gebauer; Jean-Yves Pierga; Christian Marth; Daniel Oruzio; Gro Wiedswang; Erich-Franz Solomayer; Günther Kundt; Barbara Strobl; Tanja Fehm; George Y C Wong; Judith Bliss; Anne Vincent-Salomon; Klaus Pantel Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-08-25 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Donald D Nolting; Michael Nickels; Mohammed N Tantawy; James Y H Yu; Jingping Xie; Todd E Peterson; Brenda C Crews; Larry Marnett; John C Gore; Wellington Pham Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2013-01-03 Impact factor: 6.244
Authors: Balraj Singh; Karen Tai; Simran Madan; Milan R Raythatha; Amanda M Cady; Megan Braunlin; LaTashia R Irving; Ankur Bajaj; Anthony Lucci Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-05-03 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Namita Kundu; Xinrong Ma; Tyler Kochel; Olga Goloubeva; Paul Staats; Keyata Thompson; Stuart Martin; Jocelyn Reader; Yukinori Take; Peter Collin; Amy Fulton Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2013-11-27 Impact factor: 4.872