BACKGROUND: Brucellosis is a major bacterial zoonosis affecting domestic livestock and wild mammals, as well as humans around the globe. While conducting proteomics studies to better understand Brucella abortus virulence, we consolidated the proteomic data collected and compared it to publically available genomic data. RESULTS: The proteomic data was compiled from several independent comparative studies of Brucella abortus that used either outer membrane blebs, cytosols, or whole bacteria grown in media, as well as intracellular bacteria recovered at different times following macrophage infection. We identified a total of 621 bacterial proteins that were differentially expressed in a condition-specific manner. For 305 of these proteins we provide the first experimental evidence of their expression. Using a custom-built protein sequence database, we uncovered 7 annotation errors. We provide experimental evidence of expression of 5 genes that were originally annotated as non-expressed pseudogenes, as well as start site annotation errors for 2 other genes. CONCLUSIONS: An essential element for ensuring correct functional studies is the correspondence between reported genome sequences and subsequent proteomics studies. In this study, we have used proteomics evidence to confirm expression of multiple proteins previously considered to be putative, as well as correct annotation errors in the genome of Brucella abortus strain 2308.
BACKGROUND:Brucellosis is a major bacterial zoonosis affecting domestic livestock and wild mammals, as well as humans around the globe. While conducting proteomics studies to better understand Brucella abortus virulence, we consolidated the proteomic data collected and compared it to publically available genomic data. RESULTS: The proteomic data was compiled from several independent comparative studies of Brucella abortus that used either outer membrane blebs, cytosols, or whole bacteria grown in media, as well as intracellular bacteria recovered at different times following macrophage infection. We identified a total of 621 bacterial proteins that were differentially expressed in a condition-specific manner. For 305 of these proteins we provide the first experimental evidence of their expression. Using a custom-built protein sequence database, we uncovered 7 annotation errors. We provide experimental evidence of expression of 5 genes that were originally annotated as non-expressed pseudogenes, as well as start site annotation errors for 2 other genes. CONCLUSIONS: An essential element for ensuring correct functional studies is the correspondence between reported genome sequences and subsequent proteomics studies. In this study, we have used proteomics evidence to confirm expression of multiple proteins previously considered to be putative, as well as correct annotation errors in the genome of Brucella abortus strain 2308.
Authors: Vito G DelVecchio; Vinayak Kapatral; Rajendra J Redkar; Guy Patra; Cesar Mujer; Tamara Los; Natalia Ivanova; Iain Anderson; Anamitra Bhattacharyya; Athanasios Lykidis; Gary Reznik; Lynn Jablonski; Niels Larsen; Mark D'Souza; Axel Bernal; Mikhail Mazur; Eugene Goltsman; Eugene Selkov; Philip H Elzer; Sue Hagius; David O'Callaghan; Jean-Jacques Letesson; Robert Haselkorn; Nikos Kyrpides; Ross Overbeek Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2001-12-26 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: A Cloeckaert; J M Verger; M Grayon; J Y Paquet; B Garin-Bastuji; G Foster; J Godfroid Journal: Microbes Infect Date: 2001-07 Impact factor: 2.700
Authors: Oswald R Crasta; Otto Folkerts; Zhangjun Fei; Shrinivasrao P Mane; Clive Evans; Susan Martino-Catt; Betsy Bricker; GongXin Yu; Lei Du; Bruno W Sobral Journal: PLoS One Date: 2008-05-14 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Alice R Wattam; Kelly P Williams; Eric E Snyder; Nalvo F Almeida; Maulik Shukla; A W Dickerman; O R Crasta; R Kenyon; J Lu; J M Shallom; H Yoo; T A Ficht; R M Tsolis; C Munk; R Tapia; C S Han; J C Detter; D Bruce; T S Brettin; Bruno W Sobral; Stephen M Boyle; João C Setubal Journal: J Bacteriol Date: 2009-04-03 Impact factor: 3.490
Authors: Li Liang; Xiaolin Tan; Silvia Juarez; Homarh Villaverde; Jozelyn Pablo; Rie Nakajima-Sasaki; Eduardo Gotuzzo; Mayuko Saito; Gary Hermanson; Douglas Molina; Scott Felgner; W John W Morrow; Xiaowu Liang; Robert H Gilman; D Huw Davies; Renée M Tsolis; Joseph M Vinetz; Philip L Felgner Journal: J Proteome Res Date: 2011-09-08 Impact factor: 4.466
Authors: Teane M A Silva; Juliana P S Mol; Maria G Winter; Vidya Atluri; Mariana N Xavier; Simone F Pires; Tatiane A Paixão; Hélida M Andrade; Renato L Santos; Renee M Tsolis Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-12-04 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Ana Cristina Ferreira; Lélia Chambel; Tania Tenreiro; Regina Cardoso; Lídia Flor; Isabel Travassos Dias; Teresa Pacheco; Bruno Garin-Bastuji; Philippe Le Flèche; Gilles Vergnaud; Rogério Tenreiro; Maria Inácia Corrêa de Sá Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-08-14 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Yao-Hui Sun; Maarten F de Jong; Andreas B den Hartigh; Christelle M Roux; Hortensia G Rolán; Renée M Tsolis Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol Date: 2012-04-13 Impact factor: 5.293