Literature DB >> 20461768

Optimal assessment of residual disease after neo-adjuvant therapy for locally advanced and inflammatory breast cancer--clinical examination, mammography, or magnetic resonance imaging?

F C Wright1, J Zubovits, S Gardner, B Fitzgerald, M Clemons, M L Quan, P Causer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Accurate assessment of residual disease after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NEC) for women with locally advanced and inflammatory breast cancer (LABC) is critical for planning surgery. The study's purpose was to prospectively determine the optimal method (clinical examination (CE), mammogram (MG), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)) for assessing residual disease after NEC for women with LABC.
METHODS: Women with LABC who received NEC and surgery were enrolled. Patient demographics, tumor size as measured by CE, MG, and MRI both before and after NEC, and final pathologic size of tumor were collected. Response to NEC was calculated using RECIST criteria. Paired t-tests and the Pearson correlation were used to compare tumor size on CE, MG, MRI, and final pathology.
RESULTS: Forty-eight women with 50 LABC were recruited. Mean pre-NEC tumor size was 8.2, 5.1, and 6.2 cm on CE, MG, and MRI. Mean post-NEC tumor size was 2.4, 4.3, 3.9, and 3.6 cm on CE, MG, MRI, and final pathology. The Pearson correlation co-efficient between post-NEC measurements and pathology was 0.63 (CE), 0.15 (MG), and 0.49 (MRI).
CONCLUSION: We found that there was limited correlation between the extent of residual disease after NEC for patients with LABC as assessed by CE, MG, and MRI as compared to final pathology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20461768     DOI: 10.1002/jso.21559

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0022-4790            Impact factor:   3.454


  6 in total

1.  What is the burden of axillary disease after neoadjuvant therapy in women with locally advanced breast cancer?

Authors:  C Cox; C M Holloway; A Shaheta; S Nofech-Mozes; F C Wright
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.677

2.  Comparison of efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy FEC 100 and Docetaxel 75 versus AC and Docetaxel in locally advanced breast cancer: a randomized clinical study.

Authors:  K M Dhanraj; B Dubashi; S Gollapalli; S Kayal; Sunu Lazar Cyriac
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2015-10-31       Impact factor: 3.064

3.  Evaluating the feasibility of performing window of opportunity trials in breast cancer.

Authors:  Angel Arnaout; Susan Robertson; Iryna Kuchuk; Demetrios Simos; Gregory R Pond; Christina L Addison; Mehrzad Namazi; Mark Clemons
Journal:  Int J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-01-20

4.  The role of magnetic resonance imaging in assessing residual disease and pathologic complete response in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a systematic review.

Authors:  M B I Lobbes; R Prevos; M Smidt; V C G Tjan-Heijnen; M van Goethem; R Schipper; R G Beets-Tan; J E Wildberger
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2013-01-29

5.  Agreement between MRI and pathologic breast tumor size after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and comparison with alternative tests: individual patient data meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michael L Marinovich; Petra Macaskill; Les Irwig; Francesco Sardanelli; Eleftherios Mamounas; Gunter von Minckwitz; Valentina Guarneri; Savannah C Partridge; Frances C Wright; Jae Hyuck Choi; Madhumita Bhattacharyya; Laura Martincich; Eren Yeh; Viviana Londero; Nehmat Houssami
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 6.  Meta-analysis of agreement between MRI and pathologic breast tumour size after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  M L Marinovich; P Macaskill; L Irwig; F Sardanelli; G von Minckwitz; E Mamounas; M Brennan; S Ciatto; N Houssami
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 7.640

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.