Literature DB >> 20461609

Organ donation on Web 2.0: content and audience analysis of organ donation videos on YouTube.

Yan Tian1.   

Abstract

This study examines the content of and audience response to organ donation videos on YouTube, a Web 2.0 platform, with framing theory. Positive frames were identified in both video content and audience comments. Analysis revealed a reciprocity relationship between media frames and audience frames. Videos covered content categories such as kidney, liver, organ donation registration process, and youth. Videos were favorably rated. No significant differences were found between videos produced by organizations and individuals in the United States and those produced in other countries. The findings provide insight into how new communication technologies are shaping health communication in ways that differ from traditional media. The implications of Web 2.0, characterized by user-generated content and interactivity, for health communication and health campaign practice are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20461609     DOI: 10.1080/10410231003698911

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Commun        ISSN: 1041-0236


  17 in total

1.  Comparing web-based video interventions to enhance university student willingness to donate organs: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  J Daryl Thornton; Bridget Patrick; Catherine Sullivan; Jeffrey M Albert; Kristine A Wong; Margaret D Allen; Linda Kimble; Heather Mekesa; Gordon Bowen; Ashwini R Sehgal
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 2.863

2.  The Role of Media in Non-Directed (Altruistic) Living Kidney Donation.

Authors:  Eitan Novogrodsky; Alan Yaghoubian; Sarah E Connor; Elisabeth Hicks; Grecia B Vargas; Sima Nassiri; Ariella Maghen; Lorna Kwan; Amy D Waterman; Sally L Maliski; Jeffrey L Veale
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2017-11-30

3.  Informational value and bias of videos related to orthodontics screened on a video-sharing Web site.

Authors:  Michael Knösel; Klaus Jung
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-01-24       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Public claims about automatic external defibrillators: an online consumer opinions study.

Authors:  Arthur G Money; Julie Barnett; Jasna Kuljis
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  Pharmaceutical companies and their drugs on social media: a content analysis of drug information on popular social media sites.

Authors:  Jennifer Tyrawski; David C DeAndrea
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 5.428

6.  A systematic review of methods for studying consumer health YouTube videos, with implications for systematic reviews.

Authors:  Margaret Sampson; Jordi Cumber; Claudia Li; Catherine M Pound; Ann Fuller; Denise Harrison
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  "People power" or "pester power"? YouTube as a forum for the generation of evidence and patient advocacy.

Authors:  Fadhila Mazanderani; Braden O'Neill; John Powell
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2013-07-02

8.  Identifying Measures Used for Assessing Quality of YouTube Videos with Patient Health Information: A Review of Current Literature.

Authors:  Elia Gabarron; Luis Fernandez-Luque; Manuel Armayones; Annie Ys Lau
Journal:  Interact J Med Res       Date:  2013-02-28

Review 9.  A new dimension of health care: systematic review of the uses, benefits, and limitations of social media for health communication.

Authors:  S Anne Moorhead; Diane E Hazlett; Laura Harrison; Jennifer K Carroll; Anthea Irwin; Ciska Hoving
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Autobiologies on YouTube: Narratives of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing.

Authors:  Anna Harris; Susan E Kelly; Sally Wyatt
Journal:  New Genet Soc       Date:  2014-03-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.