| Literature DB >> 20461568 |
Abstract
Despite the growing emphasis placed on the responsible conduct of research, little attention has been devoted to the question of what an individual should do upon discovering research misconduct. This article takes seriously the dilemma of a would-be whistleblower. It identifies ethical considerations that can be taken into account in moral decision-making about reporting research misconduct. It also offers rough guidelines about the moral significance of each consideration in the decision-making process based on the facts of the case in question. The article, therefore, offers tools for a would-be whistleblower to use to arrive at a defensible resolution to a difficult dilemma.Mesh:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20461568 DOI: 10.1080/08989621003791929
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Account Res ISSN: 0898-9621 Impact factor: 2.622