Literature DB >> 20461568

To tell or not to tell? The ethical dilemma of the would-be whistleblower.

Janet Malek1.   

Abstract

Despite the growing emphasis placed on the responsible conduct of research, little attention has been devoted to the question of what an individual should do upon discovering research misconduct. This article takes seriously the dilemma of a would-be whistleblower. It identifies ethical considerations that can be taken into account in moral decision-making about reporting research misconduct. It also offers rough guidelines about the moral significance of each consideration in the decision-making process based on the facts of the case in question. The article, therefore, offers tools for a would-be whistleblower to use to arrive at a defensible resolution to a difficult dilemma.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20461568     DOI: 10.1080/08989621003791929

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Account Res        ISSN: 0898-9621            Impact factor:   2.622


  3 in total

1.  Moral Distress in Scientific Research.

Authors:  David B Resnik
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 11.229

2.  Authorship Issues and Conflict in the U.S. Academic Chemical Community.

Authors:  Jeffrey I Seeman; Mark C House
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.622

3.  How should researchers cope with the ethical demands of discovering research misconduct? Going beyond reporting and whistleblowing.

Authors:  Knut Jørgen Vie
Journal:  Life Sci Soc Policy       Date:  2020-08-06
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.