Literature DB >> 20461537

Lichtenstein or darn procedure in inguinal hernia repair: a prospective randomized comparative study.

H F Kucuk1, H E Sikar, N Kurt, H Uzun, M Eser, F Tutal, Y Tuncer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the outcome of patients with inguinal hernia where the Moloney darn or Lichtenstein procedure was used as the surgical choice.
METHOD: A herniorrhaphy procedure was performed in a total of 306 patients at our clinic between January 2003 and December 2008. The duration of operations and complication and recurrent rates were compared between the two groups. Hematoma formation, seroma collection, and wound infection were accepted as early complications, whereas chronic pain, loss of sensation at the operation site, and the rejection of mesh were accepted as late complications.
RESULTS: Considering early complications as hematoma formation, the accumulation of seroma and wound infection ratios were similar in the two groups. Loss of sensation at the operation site and chronic pain, which were classified as late complications, were similar in the groups. However, in considering rejection, there were three rejections in the group where mesh was used.
CONCLUSION: The darn repair method is simple, safe, and has similar recurrence rates when compared to the Lichtenstein method in inguinal hernia patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20461537     DOI: 10.1007/s10029-010-0663-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hernia        ISSN: 1248-9204            Impact factor:   4.739


  9 in total

1.  Results of nylon-darn repairs of herniae.

Authors:  G E MOLONEY
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1958-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Prospective randomized trial of polypropylene mesh compared with nylon darn in inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  A Koukourou; W Lyon; J Rice; D A Wattchow
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  A histologic and immunohistochemical analysis of defective vaginal healing after continence taping procedures: a prospective case-controlled pilot study.

Authors:  Alex C Wang; Li-Yu Lee; Cheng-Tao Lin; Jim-Ray Chen
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Risk of recurrence 5 years or more after primary Lichtenstein mesh and sutured inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  T Bisgaard; M Bay-Nielsen; I J Christensen; H Kehlet
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Late mesh rejection as a complication to transabdominal preperitoneal laparoscopic hernia repair.

Authors:  C Hofbauer; P V Andersen; P Juul; N Qvist
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  The tension-free hernioplasty.

Authors:  I L Lichtenstein; A G Shulman; P K Amid; M M Montllor
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  From Bassini to tension-free mesh hernia repair. Review of 1409 consecutive cases.

Authors:  F Rulli; M Percudani; M Muzi; G Tucci; M Sianesi
Journal:  G Chir       Date:  1998 Jun-Jul

8.  Moloney darn repair versus lichtenstein mesh hernioplasty for open inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  Burak Kaynak; Faik Celik; Ali Guner; Kadri Guler; Mehmet A Kaya; Melek Celik
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2007-10-25       Impact factor: 2.549

9.  Comparison of modified darn repair and Lichtenstein repair of primary inguinal hernias.

Authors:  Nazif Zeybek; Huseyin Tas; Yusuf Peker; Fahrettin Yildiz; Ali Akdeniz; Turgut Tufan
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2007-09-18       Impact factor: 2.192

  9 in total
  6 in total

Review 1.  Recurrence of inguinal herniae following removal of infected prosthetic meshes: a review of the literature.

Authors:  S Rehman; S Khan; A Pervaiz; E P Perry
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2011-08-20       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  Herniotomy in young adults as an alternative to mesh repair: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  G van Kerckhoven; L Toonen; W A Draaisma; L S de Vries; P M Verheijen
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2016-08-13       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 3.  Uniformity of Chronic Pain Assessment after Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Critical Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Marijke Molegraaf; Johan Lange; Arthur Wijsmuller
Journal:  Eur Surg Res       Date:  2016-08-27       Impact factor: 1.745

4.  Open darn repair vs open mesh repair of inguinal hernia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised and non-randomised studies.

Authors:  D A Finch; V A Misra; S Hajibandeh
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 5.  A detailed analysis of outcome reporting from randomised controlled trials and meta-analyses of inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  A Bhangu; P Singh; T Pinkney; J M Blazeby
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 6.  Mesh versus non-mesh for inguinal and femoral hernia repair.

Authors:  Kathleen Lockhart; Douglas Dunn; Shawn Teo; Jessica Y Ng; Manvinder Dhillon; Edward Teo; Mieke L van Driel
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-09-13
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.