Literature DB >> 20461469

Volume-based parameter of 18)F-FDG PET/CT in malignant pleural mesothelioma: prediction of therapeutic response and prognostic implications.

Ho Yun Lee1, Seung Hyup Hyun, Kyung Soo Lee, Byung-Tae Kim, Jhingook Kim, Young Mog Shim, Myung-Ju Ahn, Tae Sung Kim, Chin A Yi, Myung Jin Chung.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the importance of assessing volume-based parameter of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) for the prediction of response and patient outcome early in the course of treatment.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients (n = 13; M:F = 9:4, mean age, 54 years) with histopathologically proven MPM, all of whom were scheduled to undergo curative extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) or palliative chemotherapy, were included in this study. They were evaluated using integrated (18)F-FDG PET/CT at baseline. Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), average SUV (SUVavg), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) were measured using PET/CT data. Relationships between tumor progression and PET parameters were statistically analyzed.
RESULTS: Of the 13 patients, 8 (62%) developed disease recurrence after surgery or tumor progression after chemotherapy (median follow-up, 329 days; range, 28-536 days). Between subgroups with and without tumor progression, significant differences were noted in MTV (P = 0.045). On ROC curve analysis, MTV (AUC = 0.850, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.550-0.977) and TLG (AUC = 0.800, 95% CI 0.494-0.960) showed good predictive performance for tumor progression. Multivariate analysis adjusted for treatment modality showed that MTV (HR 1.003, P = 0.025) and TLG (HR 1.001, P = 0.031) were independent factors associated with tumor progression. Time to tumor progression was shorter in patients with a high volume-based parameter of PET than in those with a low value.
CONCLUSIONS: Volume-based parameters of (18)F-FDG PET/CT have the potential to provide prognostic information in MPM patients who are receiving surgery or palliative chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20461469     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-010-1107-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  54 in total

1.  Impact of partial-volume effect correction on the predictive and prognostic value of baseline 18F-FDG PET images in esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Mathieu Hatt; Adrien Le Pogam; Dimitris Visvikis; Olivier Pradier; Catherine Cheze Le Rest
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 2.  Imaging-based tumor treatment response evaluation: review of conventional, new, and emerging concepts.

Authors:  Hee Kang; Ho Yun Lee; Kyung Soo Lee; Jae-Hun Kim
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 3.500

3.  Whole-body metabolic tumour volume of 18F-FDG PET/CT improves the prediction of prognosis in small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Jong-Ryool Oh; Ji-Hyoung Seo; Ari Chong; Jung-Joon Min; Ho-Chun Song; Young-Chul Kim; Hee-Seung Bom
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-01-21       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Biomarkers and prognostic factors for mesothelioma.

Authors:  Harvey I Pass
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-11

5.  PET imaging for prediction of response to therapy and outcome in oesophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  Sue Chua; John Dickson; Ashley M Groves
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 6.  Volumetric assessment in malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Authors:  David J Murphy; Ritu R Gill
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-06

7.  Classification and evaluation strategies of auto-segmentation approaches for PET: Report of AAPM task group No. 211.

Authors:  Mathieu Hatt; John A Lee; Charles R Schmidtlein; Issam El Naqa; Curtis Caldwell; Elisabetta De Bernardi; Wei Lu; Shiva Das; Xavier Geets; Vincent Gregoire; Robert Jeraj; Michael P MacManus; Osama R Mawlawi; Ursula Nestle; Andrei B Pugachev; Heiko Schöder; Tony Shepherd; Emiliano Spezi; Dimitris Visvikis; Habib Zaidi; Assen S Kirov
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 8.  The eighth TNM classification for malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Authors:  Lawek Berzenji; Paul E Van Schil; Laurens Carp
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2018-10

9.  Multiparametric fully-integrated 18-FDG PET/MRI of advanced gastric cancer for prediction of chemotherapy response: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Dong Ho Lee; Se Hyung Kim; Seock-Ah Im; Do-Youn Oh; Tae-Yong Kim; Joon Koo Han
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-11-28       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Lung volume measurements as a surrogate marker for patient response in malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Authors:  Zacariah E Labby; Samuel G Armato; James J Dignam; Christopher Straus; Hedy L Kindler; Anna K Nowak
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 15.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.