OBJECTIVE: To examine the dimensionality of the Zarit Burden Interview in a sample of carers of adults with acquired brain injury. DESIGN: A cross-sectional UK survey using postal questionnaires. PARTICIPANTS: A sample of 222 carers; 43 men (19.4%) and 179 women (80.6%); mean age 54 years. Types of brain injury included traumatic brain injury (49.5%), stroke (25.9%), brain infection (17.3%), hypoxia (4.1%), and "other" (3.2%). METHODS: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis and Rasch analysis. RESULTS: Unidimensionality was tested using confirmatory factor analysis, which showed a poor fit. The underlying structure of the Zarit Burden Interview was explored using principal components analysis and varimax rotation. This revealed 3 factors, although 1 comprised only 2 items. The 2 major factors identified were personal strain and role strain. They were then examined using Rasch analysis, which identified 2 brief and reliable unidimensional scales. There was no evidence of differential item functioning for different types of carer/brain injury. CONCLUSION: The Zarit Burden Interview is a promising mea-sure for the assessment of burden in carers of people with an acquired brain injury. It offers 2 reliable, brief subscales of personal strain and role strain for this purpose. However, it remains for these 2 brief subscales to be validated clinically in future research.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the dimensionality of the Zarit Burden Interview in a sample of carers of adults with acquired brain injury. DESIGN: A cross-sectional UK survey using postal questionnaires. PARTICIPANTS: A sample of 222 carers; 43 men (19.4%) and 179 women (80.6%); mean age 54 years. Types of brain injury included traumatic brain injury (49.5%), stroke (25.9%), brain infection (17.3%), hypoxia (4.1%), and "other" (3.2%). METHODS: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis and Rasch analysis. RESULTS: Unidimensionality was tested using confirmatory factor analysis, which showed a poor fit. The underlying structure of the Zarit Burden Interview was explored using principal components analysis and varimax rotation. This revealed 3 factors, although 1 comprised only 2 items. The 2 major factors identified were personal strain and role strain. They were then examined using Rasch analysis, which identified 2 brief and reliable unidimensional scales. There was no evidence of differential item functioning for different types of carer/brain injury. CONCLUSION: The Zarit Burden Interview is a promising mea-sure for the assessment of burden in carers of people with an acquired brain injury. It offers 2 reliable, brief subscales of personal strain and role strain for this purpose. However, it remains for these 2 brief subscales to be validated clinically in future research.
Authors: Victoria Cristancho-Lacroix; Hélène Kerhervé; Jocelyne de Rotrou; Alexandra Rouquette; Grégory Legouverneur; Anne-Sophie Rigaud Journal: JMIR Res Protoc Date: 2013-12-06
Authors: Richard J Siegert; Diana M Jackson; E Diane Playford; Simon Fleminger; Lynne Turner-Stokes Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2014-02-28 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Nicole Gideon; Nick Hawkes; Jonathan Mond; Rob Saunders; Kate Tchanturia; Lucy Serpell Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-05-03 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Lillian Flores Stevens; Treven C Pickett; Kathryn P Wilder Schaaf; Brent C Taylor; Amy Gravely; Courtney Harold Van Houtven; Greta Friedemann-Sánchez; Joan M Griffin Journal: Behav Neurol Date: 2015-12-07 Impact factor: 3.342