Literature DB >> 20461066

A decision-analytic evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of family history-based colorectal cancer screening programs.

Scott D Ramsey1, Janneke Wilschut, Rob Boer, Marjolein van Ballegooijen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the cost-effectiveness of family history screening (FHS) for colorectal cancer (CRC) susceptibility at age 40 with early screening of those with increased risk.
METHODS: The cost-effectiveness of several family history-based screening programs was estimated with a validated microsimulation model, using data from the SEER cancer registry, life tables, medicare records, and published data. Familial cancer syndromes were excluded. Screening programs evaluated included (i) colonoscopy screening every 10 years starting at age 50 (no family history assessment); (ii) colonoscopy every 10 years from age 40 for persons with a family history; (iii) colonoscopy every 5 years from age 50 for those with a family history; and (iv) colonoscopy every 5 years from age 40 for persons with a family history. In each FHS scenario, persons without a family history are screened with colonoscopy at age 50, then every 10 years to age 80.
RESULTS: Compared with colonoscopy screening of all persons from age 50, the cost-effectiveness of the family history-based screening programs varied from $18,000-$51,000 per life year (LY) gained. Screening family history cases every 5 years from age 40 is more cost-effective than screening every 10 years from age 40. Reducing screening frequency for those without a family history lowers program expenditures substantially at a modest loss of LYs. The results are sensitive to the CRC risk difference between positive and negative family histories.
CONCLUSIONS: The cost-effectiveness of CRC FHS guidelines varies widely. Economic issues should be considered before implementing family history-directed screening programs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20461066     DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2010.185

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  11 in total

1.  The impact of stratifying by family history in colorectal cancer screening programs.

Authors:  Simon Lucas Goede; Linda Rabeneck; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Ann G Zauber; Lawrence F Paszat; Jeffrey S Hoch; Jean H E Yong; Frank van Hees; Jill Tinmouth; Marjolein van Ballegooijen
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 7.396

2.  Cost-effectiveness of alternative colonoscopy surveillance strategies to mitigate metachronous colorectal cancer incidence.

Authors:  Fatih Safa Erenay; Oguzhan Alagoz; Ritesh Banerjee; Adnan Said; Robert R Cima
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Colorectal cancer screening in patients at moderately increased risk due to family history.

Authors:  Otto S Lin
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2012-06-15

Review 4.  Familial colorectal cancer: a review.

Authors:  Franco Armelao; Giovanni de Pretis
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-07-28       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Telehealth personalized cancer risk communication to motivate colonoscopy in relatives of patients with colorectal cancer: the family CARE Randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Anita Y Kinney; Watcharaporn Boonyasiriwat; Scott T Walters; Lisa M Pappas; Antoinette M Stroup; Marc D Schwartz; Sandra L Edwards; Amy Rogers; Wendy K Kohlmann; Kenneth M Boucher; Sally W Vernon; Rebecca G Simmons; Jan T Lowery; Kristina Flores; Charles L Wiggins; Deirdre A Hill; Randall W Burt; Marc S Williams; John C Higginbotham
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening in high-risk Spanish patients: use of a validated model to inform public policy.

Authors:  Uri Ladabaum; Angel Ferrandez; Angel Lanas
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 7.  Colorectal cancer screening for patients with a family history of colorectal cancer or adenomas.

Authors:  Anna N Wilkinson; David Lieberman; Grigorios I Leontiadis; Frances Tse; Alan N Barkun; Ahmed Abou-Setta; John K Marshall; Jewel Samadder; Harminder Singh; Jennifer J Telford; Jill Tinmouth; Desmond Leddin
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 3.275

8.  Multicohort models in cost-effectiveness analysis: why aggregating estimates over multiple cohorts can hide useful information.

Authors:  James F O'Mahony; Joost van Rosmalen; Ann G Zauber; Marjolein van Ballegooijen
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2012-08-27       Impact factor: 2.583

9.  Is Colorectal Cancer Screening Appropriate in Nigeria?

Authors:  Gregory C Knapp; Olusegun I Alatise; Olalekan O Olasehinde; Ademola Adeyeye; Omobolaji O Ayandipo; Martin R Weiser; T Peter Kingham
Journal:  J Glob Oncol       Date:  2019-06

10.  Cost-effectiveness of family history-based colorectal cancer screening in Australia.

Authors:  Driss A Ouakrim; Alex Boussioutas; Trevor Lockett; John L Hopper; Mark A Jenkins
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.