Literature DB >> 20461037

Internal morphometry of thoracic pedicles in the immature spine.

Eskandar Hassan1, Kai-Ming Liau, Irwan Ariffin, Abdul Halim Yusof.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A cross sectional study of thoracic pedicle morphometry in the immature spine of Malaysian population using reformatted computed tomographic (CT) images.
OBJECTIVE: To quantify the isthmus endosteal width and height in the thoracic pedicle of the immature spine. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Previous studies of thoracic pedicle morphology in the adults showed that pedicle screw fixation in the thoracic spine has a higher risk of spinal cord and segmental vessel injury because of the smaller pedicle diameter. Anatomic study of the thoracic pedicle morphology in the immature spine is lacking. Thus, the safety and feasibility of transpedicular fixation in the immature spine are still questionable.
METHODS: T1-T12 vertebral pedicles were studied in 25 Malay ethnic patients (age range, 4-18 years). Measurements of the isthmus endosteal width and isthmus endosteal height were made on reformatted CT images using linear measurement tools of Workstation software with a precision of 0.1 mm. The data collected were analyzed using SPSS software version 12.0. The patients were grouped into 3 age groups; group 1 (4-9 years), group 2 (10-14 years), and group 3 (15-18 years). Statistical differences between the age groups were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) test.
RESULTS: In group 1, none of the pedicles have an isthmus endosteal width exceeding 3.0 mm. In group 2, >50% of the pedicles from T1-T11 have an endosteal width of less than 3.0 mm. In group 3, >50% of the pedicles from T1-T10 have an endosteal width of less than 3.0 mm.
CONCLUSION: The isthmus endosteal width in >50% of the pedicles studied were less than 3.0 mm. We conclude that transpedicular fixation in the thoracic spine using pedicle screw of >3.0 mm diameter is not feasible in children and adolescents of <18 years old in our population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20461037     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c1172b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  4 in total

1.  Morphometry of the lower thoracic and lumbar pedicles and its relevance in pedicle fixation.

Authors:  S P Mohanty; M Pai Kanhangad; S N Bhat; S Chawla
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2018-02-03

2.  What is the Difference in Morphologic Features of the Thoracic Pedicle Between Patients With Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis and Healthy Subjects? A CT-based Case-control Study.

Authors:  Bo Gao; Wenjie Gao; Chong Chen; Qinghua Wang; Shaochun Lin; Caixia Xu; Dongsheng Huang; Peiqiang Su
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  TOMOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS OF C7, T1 AND T2 VERTEBRAE ANATOMY IN CHILDREN.

Authors:  Gabriela Estefanía Delgado Cabrera; Marcelo Giacomin DA Fonseca; Mauro Costa Morais Tavares; Raphael Martus Marcon; Alexandre Fogaça Cristante; Olavo Biraghi Letaif
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2021 May-Jun       Impact factor: 0.513

4.  Accuracy and safety of free-hand pedicle screw fixation in age less than 10 years.

Authors:  Hyoung Yeon Seo; Ji Hyeon Yim; Jung Pil Heo; Abhishek S Patil; Seung Min Na; Sung Kyu Kim; Jae Yoon Chung
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.251

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.