BACKGROUND: Opioid-induced respiratory depression is antagonized effectively by the competitive opioid receptor antagonist naloxone. However, to fully understand the complex opioid agonist-antagonist interaction, the effects of various naloxone doses on morphine and morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G)-induced respiratory depression were studied in healthy volunteers. METHODS: Twenty-four subjects received 0.15 mg/kg morphine intravenously at t = 0 followed by placebo, 200 or 400 microg naloxone at t = 30 min. Thirty-two subjects received 0.3 mg/kg M6G intravenously at t = 0 followed by placebo, 25, 100, or 400 microg naloxone at t = 55 min. There were a total of 8 subjects per treatment group. Respiration was measured on a breath-to-breath basis at constant end-tidal Pco2. A mechanism-based pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model consisting of a part describing biophase equilibration and a part describing receptor association-dissociation kinetics was used to analyze the data. RESULTS:Naloxone reversal of M6G-induced respiratory depression developed more slowly than reversal of the respiratory effect of morphine. A simulation study revealed that this was related to the slower receptor association-dissociation kinetics of M6G (koff M6G = 0.0327 +/- 0.00455 min versus morphine 0.138 +/- 0.0148 min; values are typical +/-SE). Duration of naloxone reversal was longer for M6G. This was related to the three- to fourfold greater potency of naloxone as an antagonist against M6G compared with morphine. Increasing the naloxone dose had no effect on the speed of reversal, but it did extend reversal duration. CONCLUSIONS:Naloxone reversal of the opioid effect is dependent on the receptor association-dissociation kinetics of the opioid that needs reversal with respect to the rate of reversal. The pharmacodynamics of naloxone determines reversal magnitude and duration.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Opioid-induced respiratory depression is antagonized effectively by the competitive opioid receptor antagonist naloxone. However, to fully understand the complex opioid agonist-antagonist interaction, the effects of various naloxone doses on morphine and morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G)-induced respiratory depression were studied in healthy volunteers. METHODS: Twenty-four subjects received 0.15 mg/kg morphine intravenously at t = 0 followed by placebo, 200 or 400 microg naloxone at t = 30 min. Thirty-two subjects received 0.3 mg/kg M6G intravenously at t = 0 followed by placebo, 25, 100, or 400 microg naloxone at t = 55 min. There were a total of 8 subjects per treatment group. Respiration was measured on a breath-to-breath basis at constant end-tidal Pco2. A mechanism-based pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model consisting of a part describing biophase equilibration and a part describing receptor association-dissociation kinetics was used to analyze the data. RESULTS:Naloxone reversal of M6G-induced respiratory depression developed more slowly than reversal of the respiratory effect of morphine. A simulation study revealed that this was related to the slower receptor association-dissociation kinetics of M6G (koff M6G = 0.0327 +/- 0.00455 min versus morphine 0.138 +/- 0.0148 min; values are typical +/-SE). Duration of naloxone reversal was longer for M6G. This was related to the three- to fourfold greater potency of naloxone as an antagonist against M6G compared with morphine. Increasing the naloxone dose had no effect on the speed of reversal, but it did extend reversal duration. CONCLUSIONS:Naloxone reversal of the opioid effect is dependent on the receptor association-dissociation kinetics of the opioid that needs reversal with respect to the rate of reversal. The pharmacodynamics of naloxone determines reversal magnitude and duration.
Authors: Louis Gendron; Catherine M Cahill; Mark von Zastrow; Peter W Schiller; Graciela Pineyro Journal: Pharmacol Rev Date: 2016-07 Impact factor: 25.468
Authors: Sudipta Sen; Sailesh Arulkumar; Elyse M Cornett; Julie A Gayle; Ronda R Flower; Charles J Fox; Alan D Kaye Journal: Curr Pain Headache Rep Date: 2016-03
Authors: Barbara Palkovic; Jennifer J Callison; Vitaliy Marchenko; Eckehard A E Stuth; Edward J Zuperku; Astrid G Stucke Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2021-10-01 Impact factor: 8.986