Literature DB >> 2045984

Trunk positioning accuracy in the frontal and sagittal planes.

K McGlashen1, J A Ashton-Miller, M Green, A B Schultz.   

Abstract

The accuracy with which the head and spine could be positioned in the frontal and sagittal planes relative to the pelvis was measured and compared in ten healthy adult males. Subjects were tested with eyes closed, while standing with their pelvis externally restrained. The positions of markers, attached to the back of the head and over each of the T1, T6, T11, and L3 spinous processes, were measured to the nearest mm using strain-gaged flexible beam transducers. Subjects were tested for their accuracy in sensing return of the trunk to an initial neutral position under different test conditions. Results showed that positioning was 16-45% more accurate in the frontal than in the sagittal plane, although the difference did not reach statistical significance. T1 could be centered to within 7 and 10 mm in the frontal and sagittal planes, respectively. No significant differences were found between active and passive positioning accuracies. Presence of an external trunk moment did not significantly affect trunk positioning accuracy, although it systematically caused overshoot of the neutral position. Lastly, lateral trunk shifts exceeding 12 mm may be classified as abnormal in young adults.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2045984     DOI: 10.1002/jor.1100090414

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  2 in total

1.  The spatiotemporal development of innervation in spinal ligaments of chickens.

Authors:  H Jiang; M Moreau; N Greidanus; J Bilo; G Russell; J Raso; K Bagnall
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Stability of the human spine in neutral postures.

Authors:  A Kiefer; A Shirazi-Adl; M Parnianpour
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.134

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.