Literature DB >> 20459189

Robust and general method for determining surface fluid flow boundary conditions in articular cartilage contact mechanics modeling.

Sainath Shrikant Pawaskar1, John Fisher, Zhongmin Jin.   

Abstract

Contact detection in cartilage contact mechanics is an important feature of any analytical or computational modeling investigation when the biphasic nature of cartilage and the corresponding tribology are taken into account. The fluid flow boundary conditions will change based on whether the surface is in contact or not, which will affect the interstitial fluid pressurization. This in turn will increase or decrease the load sustained by the fluid phase, with a direct effect on friction, wear, and lubrication. In laboratory experiments or clinical hemiarthroplasty, when a rigid indenter or metallic prosthesis is used to apply load to the cartilage, there will not be any fluid flow normal to the surface in the contact region due to the impermeable nature of the indenter/prosthesis. In the natural joint, on the other hand, where two cartilage surfaces interact, flow will depend on the pressure difference across the interface. Furthermore, in both these cases, the fluid would flow freely in non-contacting regions. However, it should be pointed out that the contact area is generally unknown in advance in both cases and can only be determined as part of the solution. In the present finite element study, a general and robust algorithm was proposed to decide nodes in contact on the cartilage surface and, accordingly, impose the fluid flow boundary conditions. The algorithm was first tested for a rigid indenter against cartilage model. The algorithm worked well for two-dimensional four-noded and eight-noded axisymmetric element models as well as three-dimensional models. It was then extended to include two cartilages in contact. The results were in excellent agreement with the previous studies reported in the literature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20459189     DOI: 10.1115/1.4000869

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech Eng        ISSN: 0148-0731            Impact factor:   2.097


  10 in total

1.  Biphasic finite element modeling of hydrated soft tissue contact using an augmented Lagrangian method.

Authors:  Hongqiang Guo; Robert L Spilker
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  In-situ studies of cartilage microtribology: roles of speed and contact area.

Authors:  E D Bonnevie; V Baro; L Wang; D L Burris
Journal:  Tribol Lett       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.106

3.  An augmented Lagrangian method for sliding contact of soft tissue.

Authors:  Hongqiang Guo; Jeffrey C Nickel; Laura R Iwasaki; Robert L Spilker
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.097

4.  A Finite Element Algorithm for Large Deformation Biphasic Frictional Contact Between Porous-Permeable Hydrated Soft Tissues.

Authors:  Brandon K Zimmerman; Steve A Maas; Jeffrey A Weiss; Gerard A Ateshian
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 2.097

5.  A finite element implementation for biphasic contact of hydrated porous media under finite deformation and sliding.

Authors:  Hongqiang Guo; Mitul Shah; Robert L Spilker
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 1.617

6.  An augmented Lagrangian finite element formulation for 3D contact of biphasic tissues.

Authors:  Hongqiang Guo; Robert L Spilker
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 1.763

7.  An analytical model to predict interstitial lubrication of cartilage in migrating contact areas.

Authors:  A C Moore; D L Burris
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  An analytical calculation of the fluid load support fraction in a biphasic material: an alternative technique.

Authors:  A J F Stops; R K Wilcox; Z Jin
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2012-05-05

9.  Development and characterisation of a decellularised bovine osteochondral biomaterial for cartilage repair.

Authors:  Hazel L Fermor; Serena L Russell; Sophie Williams; John Fisher; Eileen Ingham
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 3.896

10.  Comparison between FEBio and Abaqus for biphasic contact problems.

Authors:  Qingen Meng; Zhongmin Jin; John Fisher; Ruth Wilcox
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 1.617

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.