Literature DB >> 20458470

Biological methods for marine toxin detection.

Natalia Vilariño1, M Carmen Louzao, Mercedes R Vieytes, Luis M Botana.   

Abstract

The presence of marine toxins in seafood poses a health risk to human consumers which has prompted the regulation of the maximum content of marine toxins in seafood in the legislations of many countries. Most marine toxin groups are detected by animal bioassays worldwide. Although this method has well known ethical and technical drawbacks, it is the official detection method for all regulated phycotoxins except domoic acid. Much effort by the scientific and regulatory communities has been focused on the development of alternative techniques that enable the substitution or reduction of bioassays; some of these have recently been included in the official detection method list. During the last two decades several biological methods including use of biosensors have been adapted for detection of marine toxins. The main advances in marine toxin detection using this kind of technique are reviewed. Biological methods offer interesting possibilities for reduction of the number of biosassays and a very promising future of new developments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20458470     DOI: 10.1007/s00216-010-3782-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem        ISSN: 1618-2642            Impact factor:   4.142


  9 in total

Review 1.  Biosensor: an emerging safety tool for meat industry.

Authors:  Pradeep Kumar Singh; Gauri Jairath; Satyavir Singh Ahlawat; Ashok Pathera; Prashant Singh
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 2.701

2.  Repurposing of thermally stable nucleic-acid aptamers for targeting tetrodotoxin (TTX).

Authors:  Yuanyuan Li; Menghua Song; Ruihua Gao; Feng Lu; Jianping Liu; Qiang Huang
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 6.155

Review 3.  Biotoxin detection using cell-based sensors.

Authors:  Pratik Banerjee; Spyridon Kintzios; Balabhaskar Prabhakarpandian
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 4.546

4.  Integrating scFv into xMAP Assays for the Detection of Marine Toxins.

Authors:  Lisa C Shriver-Lake; Jinny L Liu; P Audrey Brozozog Lee; Ellen R Goldman; Richard Dietrich; Erwin Märtlbauer; George P Anderson
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 4.546

Review 5.  Is protein phosphatase inhibition responsible for the toxic effects of okadaic Acid in animals?

Authors:  Rex Munday
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 4.546

6.  Improved detection of domoic acid using covalently immobilised antibody fragments.

Authors:  María J Hortigüela; J Gerard Wall
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 5.118

Review 7.  Okadaic acid meet and greet: an insight into detection methods, response strategies and genotoxic effects in marine invertebrates.

Authors:  María Verónica Prego-Faraldo; Vanessa Valdiglesias; Josefina Méndez; José M Eirín-López
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2013-08-09       Impact factor: 5.118

Review 8.  Guanidinium Toxins and Their Interactions with Voltage-Gated Sodium Ion Channels.

Authors:  Lorena M Durán-Riveroll; Allan D Cembella
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 5.118

Review 9.  Marine Toxins Detection by Biosensors Based on Aptamers.

Authors:  Wei Ye; Taomei Liu; Weimin Zhang; Muzi Zhu; Zhaoming Liu; Yali Kong; Shan Liu
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 4.546

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.