Literature DB >> 20458196

The subjective experience of participation in schizophrenia research: a practical and ethical issue.

Peter James Taylor1, Yvonne Awenat, Patricia Gooding, Judith Johnson, Daniel Pratt, Alex Wood, Nicholas Tarrier.   

Abstract

Mental health research may pose a risk to those who participate in it, especially for potentially vulnerable groups such as those diagnosed with schizophrenia. The current study aimed to investigate the subjective experience of research participation in this group. Seventy-nine individuals with diagnoses of schizophrenia spectrum disorders who had taken part in research looking at suicide were asked to provide feedback about their experiences. Responses were analyzed using qualitative and quantitative methods. Results indicate that negative feedback concerning participation was rare, occurring in 2.5% to 15.2% of responses. Positive feedback was more frequent, occurring in 45.6% to 60.8% of responses. Qualitative thematic analysis identified 5 key themes in participants' responses: Altruism, Value of being involved in research, Therapeutic effect, Enjoyable experience and Negative experiences. The results support the view that mental health research in this group can be ethically viable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20458196     DOI: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e3181da8545

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nerv Ment Dis        ISSN: 0022-3018            Impact factor:   2.254


  6 in total

1.  Development of the TabacoQuest app for computerization of data collection on smoking in psychiatric nursing.

Authors:  Renata Marques de Oliveira; Alexandre Freitas Duarte; Domingos Alves; Antonia Regina Ferreira Furegato
Journal:  Rev Lat Am Enfermagem       Date:  2016-08-29

2.  Staff experiences and perceptions of working with in-patients who are suicidal: qualitative analysis.

Authors:  Yvonne Awenat; Sarah Peters; Emma Shaw-Nunez; Patricia Gooding; Daniel Pratt; Gillian Haddock
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 9.319

3.  A "Necessary Evil": Staff Perspectives of Soft Restraint Kit Use in a High-Security Hospital.

Authors:  Helen Walker; Lindsay Tulloch
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 4.157

4.  Psychological and occupational impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on UK surgeons: a qualitative investigation.

Authors:  Tmam Abdulaziz Al-Ghunaim; Judith Johnson; Chandra Shekhar Biyani; Daryl O'Connor
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Participating in Longitudinal Observational Research on Psychiatric Rehabilitation: Quantitative Results From a Patient Perspective Study.

Authors:  Lorenz B Dehn; Martin Driessen; Ingmar Steinhart; Thomas Beblo
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 4.157

6.  Difference and Analysis of Evaluating Psychological Monitors' Interview and Classmates' Being Interviewed About Suicide.

Authors:  Qisheng Zhan; Tianyu Xia
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-06-20
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.