Literature DB >> 20457912

Effects of the USA PATRIOT Act and the 2002 Bioterrorism Preparedness Act on select agent research in the United States.

M Beatrice Dias1, Leonardo Reyes-Gonzalez, Francisco M Veloso, Elizabeth A Casman.   

Abstract

A bibliometric analysis of the Bacillus anthracis and Ebola virus archival literature was conducted to determine whether negative consequences of the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism" (USA PATRIOT) Act and the 2002 Bioterrorism Preparedness Act on US select agent research could be discerned. Indicators of the health of the field, such as number of papers published per year, number of researchers authoring papers, and influx rate of new authors, indicated an overall stimulus to the field after 2002. As measured by interorganizational coauthorships, both B. anthracis and Ebola virus research networks expanded after 2002 in terms of the number of organizations and the degree of collaboration. Coauthorship between US and non US scientists also grew for Ebola virus but contracted for the subset of B. anthracis research that did not involve possession of viable, virulent bacteria. Some non-US institutions were dropped, and collaborations with others intensified. Contrary to expectations, research did not become centralized around a few gatekeeper institutions. Two negative effects were detected. There was an increased turnover rate of authors in the select agent community that was not observed in the control organism (Klebsiella pneumoniae) research community. However, the most striking effect observed was not associated with individual authors or institutions; it was a loss of efficiency, with an approximate 2- to 5-fold increase in the cost of doing select agent research as measured by the number of research papers published per millions of US research dollars awarded.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20457912      PMCID: PMC2906869          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0915002107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  4 in total

1.  Science and government. Biosecurity and research: minimizing adverse impacts.

Authors:  Jennifer Gaudioso; Reynolds M Salerno
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-04-30       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  U.S. courts. 'Disappointed' Butler exhausts appeals.

Authors:  Martin Enserink
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-05-26       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Booming biosafety labs probed.

Authors:  Meredith Wadman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  The "nuclearization" of biology is a threat to health and security.

Authors:  David R Franz; Susan A Ehrlich; Arturo Casadevall; Michael J Imperiale; Paul S Keim
Journal:  Biosecur Bioterror       Date:  2009-09
  4 in total
  10 in total

1.  Select agent and toxin regulations: beyond the eighth edition of the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.

Authors:  Robin J Kastenmayer; Rashida M Moore; Allison L Bright; Rafael Torres-Cruz; William R Elkins
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.232

Review 2.  Bioterrorism: Law Enforcement, Public Health & Role of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon in Emergency Preparedness.

Authors:  Divashree Sharma; Ambrish Mishra; Vilas Newaskar; Ankit Khasgiwala
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2015-09-01

3.  Unveiling the novel dual specificity protein kinases in Bacillus anthracis: identification of the first prokaryotic dual specificity tyrosine phosphorylation-regulated kinase (DYRK)-like kinase.

Authors:  Gunjan Arora; Andaleeb Sajid; Mary Diana Arulanandh; Anshika Singhal; Abid R Mattoo; Andrei P Pomerantsev; Stephen H Leppla; Souvik Maiti; Yogendra Singh
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Dual-use research and technological diffusion: reconsidering the bioterrorism threat spectrum.

Authors:  Jonathan E Suk; Anna Zmorzynska; Iris Hunger; Walter Biederbick; Julia Sasse; Heinrich Maidhof; Jan C Semenza
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 6.823

5.  Bioterrorism: lessons learned since the anthrax mailings.

Authors:  Michael J Imperiale; Arturo Casadevall
Journal:  MBio       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 7.867

Review 6.  Ebola and Marburg hemorrhagic fevers: neglected tropical diseases?

Authors:  Adam MacNeil; Pierre E Rollin
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2012-06-26

7.  From structure to solutions: the role of basic research in developing anthrax countermeasures: Microbiology Graduate Program Seminar: Anthrax toxin.

Authors:  Camille A Hardiman
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  2012-06-25

Review 8.  Pathogen security-help or hindrance?

Authors:  Stephen A Morse
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2015-01-06

9.  The dual use of research ethics committees: why professional self-governance falls short in preserving biosecurity.

Authors:  Sabine Salloch
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 2.652

10.  Dual-use research debates and public health: better integration would do no harm.

Authors:  Jonathan E Suk; Cornelius Bartels; Eeva Broberg; Marc J Struelens; Amanda J Ozin
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2014-09-12
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.