Literature DB >> 20457541

Growth hormone supplementation improves implantation and pregnancy productivity rates for poor-prognosis patients undertaking IVF.

John L Yovich1, James D Stanger.   

Abstract

In a sequential crossover study of IVF conducted from 2002 to 2006, growth hormone (GH) supplementation was assessed in poor-prognosis patients, categorized on the basis of past failure to conceive (mean 3.05 cycles) due to low response to high-dose stimulation (<3 metaphase II oocytes) or poor-quality embryos. Pregnancy rates in both fresh and frozen transfer cycles and the total productivity rates (fresh and frozen pregnancies per egg collection) were compared. In all, 159 patients had 488 treatment cycles: 221 with GH and 241 without GH. These cycles were also compared with 1572 uncategorized cycles from the same period. GH co-treatment significantly improved the clinical pregnancy rate per fresh transfer (P<0.001) as well as per frozen-thawed embryo derived from GH cycles (P<0.05) creating a highly significant productivity rate (P<0.001). The effect was significant across all age groups, especially in younger patients, and was independent of stimulation modality or number of transfers. GH cycles resulted in significantly more babies delivered per transfer than non-GH cycles (20% versus 7%; P<0.001) although less than the uncategorized cycles (53%). The data uniquely show that the effect of GH is directed at oocyte and subsequent embryo quality. 2010 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20457541     DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.03.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online        ISSN: 1472-6483            Impact factor:   3.828


  19 in total

Review 1.  Growth hormone for in vitro fertilisation (IVF).

Authors:  Akanksha Sood; Gadha Mohiyiddeen; Gaity Ahmad; Cheryl Fitzgerald; Andrew Watson; Lamiya Mohiyiddeen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-11-22

2.  Expression, regulation and function of Egr1 during implantation and decidualization in mice.

Authors:  Bin Guo; Xue-Chao Tian; Dang-Dang Li; Zhan-Qing Yang; Hang Cao; Qiao-Ling Zhang; Ju-Xiong Liu; Zhan-Peng Yue
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 4.534

3.  Supplementation of the In Vitro Maturation Culture Medium of Mouse Oocytes with Growth Hormone Improves Pregnancy Outcomes.

Authors:  Caihong Ma; Jinliang Zhu; Yihua Lin; Bingteng Xie; Xiaoxue Li; Rong Li; Jie Qiao
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 3.060

4.  The influence of different growth hormone addition protocols to poor ovarian responders on clinical outcomes in controlled ovary stimulation cycles: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xue-Li Li; Li Wang; Fang Lv; Xia-Man Huang; Li-Ping Wang; Yu Pan; Xiao-Mei Zhang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.889

5.  Does growth hormone supplementation improve oocyte competence and IVF outcomes in patients with poor embryonic development? A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jingyu Li; Qiaoli Chen; Jiang Wang; Guoning Huang; Hong Ye
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 6.  Growth Hormone and Endometrial Receptivity.

Authors:  Signe Altmäe; Lusine Aghajanova
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 5.555

Review 7.  Application of Growth Hormone in in vitro Fertilization.

Authors:  Yue-Ming Xu; Gui-Min Hao; Bu-Lang Gao
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 5.555

8.  Effect of Growth Hormone on Uterine Receptivity in Women With Repeated Implantation Failure in an Oocyte Donation Program: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Signe Altmäe; Raquel Mendoza-Tesarik; Carmen Mendoza; Nicolas Mendoza; Francesco Cucinelli; Jan Tesarik
Journal:  J Endocr Soc       Date:  2017-12-19

9.  DHEA Supplementation Confers No Additional Benefit to that of Growth Hormone on Pregnancy and Live Birth Rates in IVF Patients Categorized as Poor Prognosis.

Authors:  Kevin N Keane; Peter M Hinchliffe; Philip K Rowlands; Gayatri Borude; Shanti Srinivasan; Satvinder S Dhaliwal; John L Yovich
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 5.555

10.  Single-centre retrospective analysis of growth hormone supplementation in IVF patients classified as poor-prognosis.

Authors:  Kevin N Keane; John L Yovich; Anahita Hamidi; Peter M Hinchliffe; Satvinder S Dhaliwal
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-10-08       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.