RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Accurate segmentation of the brain ventricular system on computed tomographic (CT) imaging is useful in neurodiagnosis and neurosurgery. Manual segmentation is time consuming, usually not reproducible, and subjective. Because of image noise, low contrast between soft tissues, large interslice distance, large shape, and size variations of the ventricular system, no automatic method is presently available. The authors propose a model-guided method for the automated segmentation of the ventricular system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty CT scans of patients with strokes at different sites were collected for this study. Given a brain CT image, its ventricular system was segmented in five steps: (1) a predefined volumetric model was registered (or deformed) onto the image; (2) according to the deformed model, eight regions of interest were automatically specified; (3) the intensity threshold of cerebrospinal fluid was calculated in a region of interest and used to segment all regions of cerebrospinal fluid from the entire brain volume; (4) each ventricle was segmented in its specified region of interest; and (5) intraventricular calcification regions were identified to refine the ventricular segmentation. RESULTS: Compared to ground truths provided by experts, the segmentation results of this method achieved an average overlap ratio of 85% for the entire ventricular system. On a desktop personal computer with a dual-core central processing unit running at 2.13 GHz, about 10 seconds were required to analyze each data set. CONCLUSION: Experiments with clinical CT images showed that the proposed method can generate acceptable results in the presence of image noise, large shape, and size variations of the ventricular system, and therefore it is potentially useful for the quantitative interpretation of CT images in neurodiagnosis and neurosurgery. Copyright (c) 2010 AUR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Accurate segmentation of the brain ventricular system on computed tomographic (CT) imaging is useful in neurodiagnosis and neurosurgery. Manual segmentation is time consuming, usually not reproducible, and subjective. Because of image noise, low contrast between soft tissues, large interslice distance, large shape, and size variations of the ventricular system, no automatic method is presently available. The authors propose a model-guided method for the automated segmentation of the ventricular system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty CT scans of patients with strokes at different sites were collected for this study. Given a brain CT image, its ventricular system was segmented in five steps: (1) a predefined volumetric model was registered (or deformed) onto the image; (2) according to the deformed model, eight regions of interest were automatically specified; (3) the intensity threshold of cerebrospinal fluid was calculated in a region of interest and used to segment all regions of cerebrospinal fluid from the entire brain volume; (4) each ventricle was segmented in its specified region of interest; and (5) intraventricular calcification regions were identified to refine the ventricular segmentation. RESULTS: Compared to ground truths provided by experts, the segmentation results of this method achieved an average overlap ratio of 85% for the entire ventricular system. On a desktop personal computer with a dual-core central processing unit running at 2.13 GHz, about 10 seconds were required to analyze each data set. CONCLUSION: Experiments with clinical CT images showed that the proposed method can generate acceptable results in the presence of image noise, large shape, and size variations of the ventricular system, and therefore it is potentially useful for the quantitative interpretation of CT images in neurodiagnosis and neurosurgery. Copyright (c) 2010 AUR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: M C Metzger; G Bittermann; L Dannenberg; R Schmelzeisen; N-C Gellrich; B Hohlweg-Majert; C Scheifele Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2013-02-17 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: V Adduru; S A Baum; C Zhang; M Helguera; R Zand; M Lichtenstein; C J Griessenauer; A M Michael Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2020-01-30 Impact factor: 3.825