Literature DB >> 20457286

Bowel preparation: comparing metabolic and electrolyte changes when using sodium phosphate/polyethylene glycol.

Zahar Shapira1, Leonid Feldman, Ron Lavy, Joshua Weissgarten, Zoya Haitov, Ariel Halevy.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many patients with various types of colonic pathology undergo invasive procedures that require mechanical bowel preparation. The most commonly used medications for bowel preparation include phosphate-containing drugs which are low cost and enable this procedure to be performed in an outpatient setting, as opposed to other medications, such as polyethylene glycol. Recent studies have suggested that freely using phosphate-containing drugs might lead to renal function impairment in a small group of patients. Despite this, many surgeons still use these drugs to prepare their patients. We conducted a comparative study to check the side effects of phosphate-containing drugs compared to polyethylene glycol when used for bowel cleansing.
METHODS: We conducted a double blind prospective randomized study that included 40 patients undergoing surgery for colonic pathology, all of whom underwent bowel cleansing (20 with sodium phosphate and 20 with polyethylene glycol). During the perioperative course, electrolyte parameters were collected from serum and urine and compared between the two groups of patients.
RESULTS: Changes in electrolyte and metabolic parameters were shown in both groups, but more prominently in patients prepared with sodium phosphate. In addition, early signs of renal function impairment appeared in this group. The differences in metabolic and electrolyte changes between the two groups were statistically significant.
CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of this study, we propose that the wide use of phosphate-containing drugs for colonic preparation might be dangerous for the specific group of patients that is prone to develop renal failure or electrolyte abnormalities. Copyright 2010 Surgical Associates Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20457286     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.04.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Surg        ISSN: 1743-9159            Impact factor:   6.071


  8 in total

1.  The use of an implemented infection prevention bundle reduces the incidence of surgical site infections after colorectal surgery: a retrospective single center analysis.

Authors:  Damiano Caputo; Alessandro Coppola; Tommaso Farolfi; Vincenzo La Vaccara; Silvia Angeletti; Chiara Cascone; Massimo Ciccozzi; Roberto Coppola
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-01-05

2.  Prospective randomised controlled trial using the REthinking Clinical Trials (REaCT) platform and National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) to compare no preparation versus preoperative oral antibiotics alone for surgical site infection rates in elective colon surgery: a protocol.

Authors:  Sameer S Apte; Husein Moloo; Ahwon Jeong; Michelle Liu; Lisa Vandemeer; Kathryn Suh; Kednapa Thavorn; Dean A Fergusson; Mark Clemons; Rebecca C Auer
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  The Role of Oral Antibiotic Preparation in Elective Colorectal Surgery: A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Katie E Rollins; Hannah Javanmard-Emamghissi; Austin G Acheson; Dileep N Lobo
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Outcome of no oral antibiotic prophylaxis and bowel preparation in Crohn's diseases surgery.

Authors:  Lukas Walter Unger; Stefan Riss; Stanislaus Argeny; Michael Bergmann; Thomas Bachleitner-Hofmann; Friedrich Herbst; Anton Stift
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 1.704

5.  Preoperative oral antibiotics reduce infections after colorectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Michal Mik; Maciej Berut; Radzislaw Trzcinski; Lukasz Dziki; Jaroslaw Buczynski; Adam Dziki
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 3.445

6.  Impact of mechanical bowel preparation in elective colorectal surgery: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Katie E Rollins; Hannah Javanmard-Emamghissi; Dileep N Lobo
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-01-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 7.  Updates of Risk Factors for Anastomotic Leakage after Colorectal Surgery.

Authors:  Eugenia Claudia Zarnescu; Narcis Octavian Zarnescu; Radu Costea
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-17

8.  Initial experience of intraoperative fluorescent cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Nattawut Keeratibharat
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2021-07-15
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.