Literature DB >> 20457257

Structural determinants stabilizing helical distortions related to proline.

Julien Rey1, Julie Deville, Marie Chabbert.   

Abstract

The distortions related to proline in a alpha-helix can be accommodated by different structural elements. To obtain an exhaustive view of these distortions, we data mined a non-redundant subset of the Protein Data Bank in search of proline residues included either within contiguous helices or within structural motifs in which two helices are joined by a few linker residues with backbone dihedral angles in the generous alpha region. The distortions correspond to "typical" and "non-typical" proline distortions, with relative ratio of 0.65 and 0.35, respectively. Analysis of "non-typical" proline distortions indicates that most linkers have one (75%) or two residues (20%) and that proline is preferentially located at the second or third position of the second helix (95%). The dihedral angles of the linker residues are located in two areas of the generous alpha region. Structures with linker(s) in the alpha1 area, which is characterized by very negative phi values, possess i to i-5 H-bonds and correspond to pi bulges. Structures with linker(s) in the alpha2 area, which links the alpha and beta regions, possess i to i-3 H-bonds and correspond to tight turns. Further classification of bulges and turns as a function of the linker length and proline position yields five canonical structures, representing 85% of "non-typical" proline distortions. These structures are characterized by distinct H-bonding patterns and structural determinants and correspond to different classes of pi bulges and tight turns. This hierarchical approach provides a straightforward and robust classification of proline-related helical distortions. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20457257     DOI: 10.1016/j.jsb.2010.05.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Struct Biol        ISSN: 1047-8477            Impact factor:   2.867


  8 in total

1.  Novel mutation in spectrin-like repeat 1 of dystrophin central domain causes protein misfolding and mild Becker muscular dystrophy.

Authors:  Gyula Acsadi; Steven A Moore; Angélique Chéron; Olivier Delalande; Lindsey Bennett; William Kupsky; Mohammad El-Baba; Elisabeth Le Rumeur; Jean-François Hubert
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Status of GPCR modeling and docking as reflected by community-wide GPCR Dock 2010 assessment.

Authors:  Irina Kufareva; Manuel Rueda; Vsevolod Katritch; Raymond C Stevens; Ruben Abagyan
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 5.006

3.  Combined mutation screening of NKX2-5, GATA4, and TBX5 in congenital heart disease: multiple heterozygosity and novel mutations.

Authors:  Javier T Granados-Riveron; Mark Pope; Frances A Bu'lock; Christopher Thornborough; Jacqueline Eason; Kerry Setchfield; Ami Ketley; Edwin P Kirk; Diane Fatkin; Michael P Feneley; Richard P Harvey; J David Brook
Journal:  Congenit Heart Dis       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 2.007

4.  Coupled folding and binding of the disordered protein PUMA does not require particular residual structure.

Authors:  Joseph M Rogers; Chi T Wong; Jane Clarke
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 15.419

5.  Helix kinks are equally prevalent in soluble and membrane proteins.

Authors:  Henry R Wilman; Jiye Shi; Charlotte M Deane
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2014-04-16

6.  TMalphaDB and TMbetaDB: web servers to study the structural role of sequence motifs in α-helix and β-barrel domains of membrane proteins.

Authors:  Marc Perea; Ivar Lugtenburg; Eduardo Mayol; Arnau Cordomí; Xavier Deupí; Leonardo Pardo; Mireia Olivella
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Alpha-bulges in G protein-coupled receptors.

Authors:  Rob van der Kant; Gert Vriend
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Molecular Insights into the Transmembrane Domain of the Thyrotropin Receptor.

Authors:  Vanessa Chantreau; Bruck Taddese; Mathilde Munier; Louis Gourdin; Daniel Henrion; Patrice Rodien; Marie Chabbert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.