Literature DB >> 20457007

Determination and evaluation of clinically efficient stopping criteria for the multiple auditory steady-state response technique.

Wendy D'haenens1, Bart M Vinck, Leen Maes, Annelies Bockstael, Hannah Keppler, Birgit Philips, Freya Swinnen, Ingeborg Dhooge.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed at establishing clinically efficient stopping criteria for a multiple 80-Hz auditory steady-state response (ASSR) system.
METHODS: In Experiment 1, data of 31 normal-hearing subjects were analyzed off-line to propose stopping rules. Consequently, ASSR recordings will be stopped when (1) all 8 responses reach significance and significance can be maintained for 8 consecutive sweeps; or (2) the mean noise levels were 4nV (if p-values were between 0.05 and 0.1, measurements were extended once by 8 sweeps); or (3) a maximum amount of 48 sweeps was attained; whichever occurred first. In Experiment 2, these stopping criteria were applied on 10 normal hearing and 10 hearing-impaired adults to assess the efficiency.
RESULTS: The application of these stopping rules resulted in ASSR threshold values that were comparable to other ASSR research. Furthermore, preliminary analysis of the response and noise amplitudes demonstrated slightly higher values for hearing impaired than normal-hearing subjects.
CONCLUSIONS: The proposed stopping rules can be used in adults to determine accurate ASSR thresholds within a time-frame of about 1h. SIGNIFICANCE: The use of these a priori stopping criteria might assist the clinician in their decision to terminate ASSR recordings. Copyright 2010 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20457007     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2010.03.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  7 in total

1.  Towards an optimal paradigm for intraoperative auditory nerve monitoring with auditory steady state responses.

Authors:  Stefan Rampp; Leonhard Rensch; Sebastian Simmermacher; Torsten Rahne; Christian Strauss; Julian Prell
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-02-06       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Automatic audiometry using auditory steady-state response and sequential test strategy applied to volunteers with normal hearing.

Authors:  Tiago Zanotelli; Felipe Antunes; Eduardo Mazoni Andrade Marçal Mendes; Leonardo Bonato Felix
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Auditory steady state responses in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired adults: an analysis of between-session amplitude and latency repeatability, test time, and F ratio detection paradigms.

Authors:  Timothy S Wilding; Colette M McKay; Richard J Baker; Karolina Kluk
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Fast hearing-threshold estimation using multiple auditory steady-state responses with narrow-band chirps and adaptive stimulus patterns.

Authors:  Roland Mühler; Katrin Mentzel; Jesko Verhey
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-04-24

5.  Auditory steady-state responses in school-aged children: a pilot study.

Authors:  Luciana Macedo de Resende; Sirley Alves da Silva Carvalho; Thamara Suzi Dos Santos; Filipe Ibraim Abdo; Matheus Romão; Marcela Cristina Ferreira; Carlos Julio Tierra-Criollo
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 4.262

6.  Habituation of Auditory Steady State Responses Evoked by Amplitude-Modulated Acoustic Signals in Rats.

Authors:  Pavel Prado-Gutierrez; Anisleidy Castro-Fariñas; Lisbet Morgado-Rodriguez; Ernesto Velarde-Reyes; Agustín D Martínez; Eduardo Martínez-Montes
Journal:  Audiol Res       Date:  2015-01-21

7.  Comparative study between pure tone audiometry and auditory steady-state responses in normal hearing subjects.

Authors:  Roberto Miquelino de Oliveira Beck; Bernardo Faria Ramos; Signe Schuster Grasel; Henrique Faria Ramos; Maria Flávia Bonadia B de Moraes; Edigar Rezende de Almeida; Ricardo Ferreira Bento
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.