BACKGROUND: Detection of viral genome in rejecting cardiac transplant patients has been reported, with coxsackievirus and adenovirus causing premature graft failure. Recently, parvovirus B19 (PVB19) genome in myocardial samples has been increasingly reported, but its role in cardiac pathology and effect on transplant graft survival are unknown. The objectives of this study were to determine if changes in the viruses identified in the myocardium represent an epidemiologic shift in viral myocardial disease and whether PVB19 adversely affects transplant graft survival. METHODS: From September 2002 to December 2005, nested polymerase chain reaction was used to evaluate endomyocardial biopsy specimens for 99 children (aged 3 weeks-18 years) with heart transplants for the presence of viral genome. Cellular rejection was assessed by histology of specimens. Transplant coronary artery disease (TCAD) was diagnosed by coronary angiography or histopathology. RESULTS: Specimens from 700 biopsies were evaluated from 99 patients; 121 specimens had viral genome, with 100 (82.6%) positive for PVB19, 24 for Epstein-Barr virus (EBV; 7 positive for PVB19 and EBV), 3 for CMV, and 1 for adenovirus. Presence of PVB19 genome did not correlate with rejection score, nor did a higher viral copy number. Early development of advanced TCAD (p < 0.001) occurred in 20 children with persistent PVB19 infection (> 6 months). CONCLUSIONS: PVB19 is currently the predominant virus detected in heart transplant surveillance biopsy specimens, possibly representing an epidemiologic shift. Cellular rejection does not correlate with the presence or quantity of PVB19 genome in the myocardium, but children with chronic PVB19 infection have increased risk for earlier TCAD, supporting the hypothesis that PVB19 negatively affects graft survival.
BACKGROUND: Detection of viral genome in rejecting cardiac transplant patients has been reported, with coxsackievirus and adenovirus causing premature graft failure. Recently, parvovirus B19 (PVB19) genome in myocardial samples has been increasingly reported, but its role in cardiac pathology and effect on transplant graft survival are unknown. The objectives of this study were to determine if changes in the viruses identified in the myocardium represent an epidemiologic shift in viral myocardial disease and whether PVB19 adversely affects transplant graft survival. METHODS: From September 2002 to December 2005, nested polymerase chain reaction was used to evaluate endomyocardial biopsy specimens for 99 children (aged 3 weeks-18 years) with heart transplants for the presence of viral genome. Cellular rejection was assessed by histology of specimens. Transplant coronary artery disease (TCAD) was diagnosed by coronary angiography or histopathology. RESULTS: Specimens from 700 biopsies were evaluated from 99 patients; 121 specimens had viral genome, with 100 (82.6%) positive for PVB19, 24 for Epstein-Barr virus (EBV; 7 positive for PVB19 and EBV), 3 for CMV, and 1 for adenovirus. Presence of PVB19 genome did not correlate with rejection score, nor did a higher viral copy number. Early development of advanced TCAD (p < 0.001) occurred in 20 children with persistent PVB19 infection (> 6 months). CONCLUSIONS:PVB19 is currently the predominant virus detected in heart transplant surveillance biopsy specimens, possibly representing an epidemiologic shift. Cellular rejection does not correlate with the presence or quantity of PVB19 genome in the myocardium, but children with chronic PVB19 infection have increased risk for earlier TCAD, supporting the hypothesis that PVB19 negatively affects graft survival.
Authors: M E Billingham; N R Cary; M E Hammond; J Kemnitz; C Marboe; H A McCallister; D C Snovar; G L Winters; A Zerbe Journal: J Heart Transplant Date: 1990 Nov-Dec
Authors: J A Towbin; L D Griffin; A B Martin; S Nelson; B Siu; N A Ayres; G Demmler; K J Moise; Y H Zhang Journal: Pediatr Infect Dis J Date: 1994-02 Impact factor: 2.129
Authors: A B Martin; S Webber; F J Fricker; R Jaffe; G Demmler; D Kearney; Y H Zhang; J Bodurtha; B Gelb; J Ni Journal: Circulation Date: 1994-07 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Garrick C Stewart; Javier Lopez-Molina; Raju V S R K Gottumukkala; Gregg F Rosner; Mary S Anello; Jonathan L Hecht; Gayle L Winters; Robert F Padera; Kenneth L Baughman; Myra A Lipes Journal: Circ Heart Fail Date: 2010-11-19 Impact factor: 8.790
Authors: David I Bernstein; Hana M El Sahly; Wendy A Keitel; Mark Wolff; Gina Simone; Claire Segawa; Susan Wong; Daniel Shelly; Neal S Young; Walla Dempsey Journal: Vaccine Date: 2011-07-30 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: Petr Kuchynka; Tomas Palecek; Tomas Grus; Jana Schramlova; Daniel Krsek; Ivana Vitkova; Vilem Rohn; Jaroslav Lindner; Eleanor Wicks; Eduard Nemecek; Gabriela Dostalova; Jana Podzimkova; Ales Linhart Journal: Folia Microbiol (Praha) Date: 2015-07-24 Impact factor: 2.099
Authors: Jason N Johnson; Daniel B Loriaux; Elizabeth Jenista; Han W Kim; Anna Baritussio; Estefania De Garate Iparraguirre; Chiara Bucciarelli-Ducci; Vanessa Denny; Brian O'Connor; Saira Siddiqui; Kana Fujikura; Charles W Benton; Jonathan W Weinsaft; Jonathan Kochav; Jiwon Kim; Chaitanya Madamanchi; Michael Steigner; Raymond Kwong; Diego Chango-Azanza; Mónica Chapa; Sandra Rosales-Uvera; Puja Sitwala; Peter Filev; Anurag Sahu; Jason Craft; George J Punnakudiyil; Viraj Jayam; Farah Shams; Sean G Hughes; Jonan C Y Lee; Edward A Hulten; Kevin E Steel; Sylvia S M Chen Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2022-07-04 Impact factor: 6.903