Literature DB >> 20456944

Socioeconomic inequalities in the use of radiotherapy for rectal cancer: a nationwide study.

L I Olsson1, F Granström, B Glimelius.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Preoperative radiotherapy (PRT) in rectal cancer reduces the risk of local recurrence by at least half but the influence of the socioeconomic status of patients on the use of PRT is little investigated in Europe.
METHODS: Individually attained data on civil status, education and income were linked to the Swedish Rectal Cancer Registry 1995-2005 (n=16,713) and analysed by logistic regression.
RESULTS: Forty-six percentage of the patients received PRT and the crude rate varied with age, gender, civil status, education and income as well as with sublocalisation, stage, type of hospital and health care region. In a multivariate analysis, all civil status groups had PRT to a lesser extent compared with married patients; odds ratio (OR) for unmarried patients was 0.67 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.59-0.76). Patients with secondary and university education had PRT to the same extent as those with compulsory school (OR 1.04 (0.94-1.15) and 0.92 (0.81-1.06)). The use of PRT was associated with income; OR for patients with income Q1 versus Q4 was 0.76 (0.67-0.86). The inequalities by civil status and income remained unchanged also in groups with a relatively stronger indication for adjuvant radiotherapy, i.e. younger patients and in low rectal cancer.
CONCLUSION: Unmarried and low-income patients are at increased risk for not receiving PRT in rectal cancer. Comorbidity may explain some differences but increased awareness of the role of non-medical variables for the use of PRT is warranted.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20456944     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.03.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  6 in total

Review 1.  Research in cancer care disparities in countries with universal healthcare: mapping the field and its conceptual contours.

Authors:  Christina Sinding; Rachel Warren; Donna Fitzpatrick-Lewis; Jonathan Sussman
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Socioeconomic inequalities in relative survival of rectal cancer most obvious in stage III.

Authors:  L I Olsson; F Granstrom
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Related to Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy in Rectal Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Xingxing Chen; Ruifang Lin; Huifang Li; Meng Su; Wenyi Zhang; Xia Deng; Ping Zhang; Changlin Zou
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 2.260

4.  Equal cancer treatment regardless of education level and family support? A qualitative study of oncologists' decision-making.

Authors:  Nina Cavalli-Björkman; Bengt Glimelius; Peter Strang
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 5.  Inequity of access to ACE inhibitors in Swedish heart failure patients: a register-based study.

Authors:  Anna Ohlsson; Bertil Lindahl; Marianne Hanning; Ragnar Westerling
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 6.  Practical considerations for prostate hypofractionation in the developing world.

Authors:  Michael Yan; Andre G Gouveia; Fabio L Cury; Nikitha Moideen; Vanessa F Bratti; Horacio Patrocinio; Alejandro Berlin; Lucas C Mendez; Fabio Y Moraes
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 14.432

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.