Literature DB >> 20456579

The use of adhesive tape for recovery of DNA from crime scene items.

Mark Barash1, Ayeleth Reshef, Paul Brauner.   

Abstract

The selection of the appropriate method of collection of biological material from crime scene items can be crucial to obtaining a DNA profile. The three techniques commonly used for sampling items are: cutting, swabbing, and taping. The tape sampling technique offers an advantage, in that it enables the collection of a potentially highly informative source of DNA, shed epithelial cells, from selected areas on crime scene items (the inside fingers of a glove, for instance). Furthermore, surface collection of biological material by taping reduces co-sampling of known PCR inhibitors such as clothing dyes. The correct choice of tape for crime scene item sampling is important. Not all tapes are suitable for biological trace evidence collection as well as DNA extraction. We report on one tape that met both these criteria. Three different cases are presented which demonstrate the usefulness of adhesive tape sampling of crime items. Finally, the advantages of the tape collection technique are discussed and guidelines for preferred areas of tape sampling on various casework items are presented.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20456579     DOI: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01416.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Forensic Sci        ISSN: 0022-1198            Impact factor:   1.832


  10 in total

1.  Electrostatic sampling of trace DNA from clothing.

Authors:  Martin Zieger; Priscille Merciani Defaux; Silvia Utz
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 2.686

2.  RNA/DNA co-analysis on aged bloodstains from adhesive tapes used for gunshot residue collection from hands.

Authors:  Melanie Grabmüller; Christian Schyma; Burkhard Madea; Tim Eichhorst; Cornelius Courts
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 2.007

3.  Laundry in a washing machine as a mediator of secondary and tertiary DNA transfer.

Authors:  Lev Voskoboinik; Merav Amiel; Ayeleth Reshef; Ron Gafny; Mark Barash
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 2.686

4.  DNA profiles from clothing fibers using direct PCR.

Authors:  Renée Blackie; Duncan Taylor; Adrian Linacre
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2016-07-16       Impact factor: 2.007

5.  Forensic trace DNA: a review.

Authors:  Roland Ah van Oorschot; Kaye N Ballantyne; R John Mitchell
Journal:  Investig Genet       Date:  2010-12-01

6.  Noninvasive sample collection for the genotyping of neonatal rats using adhesive tape.

Authors:  Mariko Shirota; Miho Suzuki; Hiroaki Tanaka; Kanako Sueoka; Yuri Yoshikawa; Kazuaki Tanaka
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 1.267

7.  Comparison of preprocessing methods and storage times for touch DNA samples.

Authors:  Hui Dong; Jing Wang; Tao Zhang; Jian-Ye Ge; Ying-Qiang Dong; Qi-Fan Sun; Chao Liu; Cai-Xia Li
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 1.351

8.  Touch DNA: impact of handling time on touch deposit and evaluation of different recovery techniques: An experimental study.

Authors:  Francesco Sessa; Monica Salerno; Giuseppe Bertozzi; Giovanni Messina; Pietrantonio Ricci; Caterina Ledda; Venerando Rapisarda; Santina Cantatore; Emanuela Turillazzi; Cristoforo Pomara
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Comparison of the M-Vac® Wet-Vacuum-Based Collection Method to a Wet-Swabbing Method for DNA Recovery on Diluted Bloodstained Substrates*,, ‡.

Authors:  Jessica M McLamb; Lara D Adams; Mark F Kavlick
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 1.832

10.  An Advanced Tape-Stripping Approach for High-Efficiency Sampling on Non-Absorbent Surfaces.

Authors:  Pengcheng Zhao; Pak-To Chan; Nan Zhang; Yuguo Li
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-10-01       Impact factor: 4.614

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.