Literature DB >> 20455918

Complex state-dependent games between owls and gerbils.

Oded Berger-Tal1, Shomen Mukherjee, Burt P Kotler, Joel S Brown.   

Abstract

Predator-prey interactions are often behaviourally sophisticated games in which the predator and prey are players. Past studies teach us that hungrier prey take higher risks when foraging and that hungrier predators increase their foraging activity and are willing to take higher risks of injury. Yet no study has looked at the simultaneous responses of predator and prey to their own and each other's hunger levels in a controlled environment. We looked for evidence of a state-dependent game between predators and their prey by simultaneously manipulating the hunger state of barn owls, and Allenby's gerbils as prey. The owls significantly increased their activity when hungry. However, they did not appear to respond to changes in the hunger state of the gerbils. The gerbils reacted strongly to the owls' state, as well as to their own state when the risk was perceived as high. Our study shows that predator-prey interactions give rise to a complex state-dependent game.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20455918     DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01447.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Lett        ISSN: 1461-023X            Impact factor:   9.492


  8 in total

1.  Separating spatial search and efficiency rates as components of predation risk.

Authors:  Nicholas J DeCesare
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  To dare or not to dare? Risk management by owls in a predator-prey foraging game.

Authors:  Keren Embar; Ashael Raveh; Darren Burns; Burt P Kotler
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  The dilemma of foraging herbivores: dealing with food and fear.

Authors:  Clare McArthur; Peter B Banks; Rudy Boonstra; Jennifer Sorensen Forbey
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Responses of a top and a meso predator and their prey to moon phases.

Authors:  Vincenzo Penteriani; Anna Kuparinen; Maria del Mar Delgado; Francisco Palomares; José Vicente López-Bao; José María Fedriani; Javier Calzada; Sacramento Moreno; Rafael Villafuerte; Letizia Campioni; Rui Lourenço
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Risk of predation makes foragers less choosy about their food.

Authors:  Alice Charalabidis; François-Xavier Dechaume-Moncharmont; Sandrine Petit; David A Bohan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The effect of COVID19 pandemic restrictions on an urban rodent population.

Authors:  Miguel A Bedoya-Pérez; Michael P Ward; Max Loomes; Iain S McGregor; Mathew S Crowther
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  To feed or not to feed? Bioenergetic impacts of fear-driven behaviors in lactating dolphins.

Authors:  Mridula Srinivasan; Todd M Swannack; William E Grant; Jolly Rajan; Bernd Würsig
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 2.912

Review 8.  Fire as a driver and mediator of predator-prey interactions.

Authors:  Tim S Doherty; William L Geary; Chris J Jolly; Kristina J Macdonald; Vivianna Miritis; Darcy J Watchorn; Michael J Cherry; L Mike Conner; Tania Marisol González; Sarah M Legge; Euan G Ritchie; Clare Stawski; Chris R Dickman
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2022-03-23
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.