OBJECTIVES: By using tracer techniques, we explored the metabolic mechanisms by which pioglitazone treatment for 16 weeks improves oral glucose tolerance in patients with type 2 diabetes when compared to subjects without diabetes. METHODS: In all subjects, before and after treatment, we measured rates of tissue glucose clearance (MCR), oral glucose appearance (RaO) and endogenous glucose production (EGP) during a (4-h) double tracer oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) (1-(14)C-glucose orally and 3-(3)H-glucose intravenously). Basal hepatic insulin resistance index (HepIR) was calculated as EGPxFPI. beta-cell function was assessed as the incremental ratio of insulin to glucose (DeltaI/DeltaG) during the OGTT. RESULTS: Pioglitazone decreased fasting plasma glucose concentration (10.5 +/- 0.7 to 7.8 +/- 0.6 mM, P < 0.0003) and HbA1c (9.7 +/- 0.7 to 7.5 +/- 0.5%, P < 0.003) despite increased body weight and no change in plasma insulin concentrations. This was determined by a decrease both in fasting EGP (20.0 +/- 1.1 to 17.3 +/- 0.8 micromol/kg(ffm) min, P < 0.005) and HepIR (from 8194 declined by 49% to 3989, P < 0.002). During the OGTT, total glucose Ra during the 0- to 120-min time period following glucose ingestion decreased significantly because of a reduction in EGP. During the 0- to 240-min time period, pioglitazone caused only a modest increase in MCR (P < 0.07) but markedly increased DeltaI/DeltaG (P = 0.003). The decrease in 2h-postprandial hyperglycaemia correlated closely with the increase in DeltaI/DeltaG (r = -0.76, P = 0.004) and tissue clearance (r = -0.74, P = 0.006) and with the decrease in HepIR (r = 0.62, P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: In diabetic subjects with poor glycaemic control, pioglitazone improves oral glucose tolerance mainly by enhancing the suppression of EGP and improving beta-cell function.
OBJECTIVES: By using tracer techniques, we explored the metabolic mechanisms by which pioglitazone treatment for 16 weeks improves oral glucose tolerance in patients with type 2 diabetes when compared to subjects without diabetes. METHODS: In all subjects, before and after treatment, we measured rates of tissue glucose clearance (MCR), oral glucose appearance (RaO) and endogenous glucose production (EGP) during a (4-h) double tracer oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) (1-(14)C-glucose orally and 3-(3)H-glucose intravenously). Basal hepatic insulin resistance index (HepIR) was calculated as EGPxFPI. beta-cell function was assessed as the incremental ratio of insulin to glucose (DeltaI/DeltaG) during the OGTT. RESULTS:Pioglitazone decreased fasting plasma glucose concentration (10.5 +/- 0.7 to 7.8 +/- 0.6 mM, P < 0.0003) and HbA1c (9.7 +/- 0.7 to 7.5 +/- 0.5%, P < 0.003) despite increased body weight and no change in plasma insulin concentrations. This was determined by a decrease both in fasting EGP (20.0 +/- 1.1 to 17.3 +/- 0.8 micromol/kg(ffm) min, P < 0.005) and HepIR (from 8194 declined by 49% to 3989, P < 0.002). During the OGTT, total glucoseRa during the 0- to 120-min time period following glucose ingestion decreased significantly because of a reduction in EGP. During the 0- to 240-min time period, pioglitazone caused only a modest increase in MCR (P < 0.07) but markedly increased DeltaI/DeltaG (P = 0.003). The decrease in 2h-postprandial hyperglycaemia correlated closely with the increase in DeltaI/DeltaG (r = -0.76, P = 0.004) and tissue clearance (r = -0.74, P = 0.006) and with the decrease in HepIR (r = 0.62, P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: In diabetic subjects with poor glycaemic control, pioglitazone improves oral glucose tolerance mainly by enhancing the suppression of EGP and improving beta-cell function.
Authors: Y Miyazaki; A Mahankali; M Matsuda; L Glass; S Mahankali; E Ferrannini; K Cusi; L J Mandarino; R A DeFronzo Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2001-04 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: D G Maggs; T A Buchanan; C F Burant; G Cline; B Gumbiner; W A Hsueh; S Inzucchi; D Kelley; J Nolan; J M Olefsky; K S Polonsky; D Silver; T R Valiquett; G I Shulman Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 1998-02-01 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: L C Groop; R C Bonadonna; S DelPrato; K Ratheiser; K Zyck; E Ferrannini; R A DeFronzo Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 1989-07 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Jennifer E Lambert; Maria A Ramos-Roman; Jeffrey D Browning; Elizabeth J Parks Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2013-12-04 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Emileigh Mercer; Laura Rekedal; Rajesh Garg; Bing Lu; Elena M Massarotti; Daniel H Solomon Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Date: 2012-06-07 Impact factor: 5.156