Literature DB >> 20455693

How many lumens should be cultured in the conservative diagnosis of catheter-related bloodstream infections?

María Guembe1, Marta Rodríguez-Créixems, Carlos Sánchez-Carrillo, Alfonso Pérez-Parra, Pablo Martín-Rabadán, Emilio Bouza.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent practice guidelines for the diagnosis of catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) describe as an "unresolved issue" the number of lumens from which blood culture specimens should be drawn to make a conservative diagnosis of CRBSI. Our objective was to determine how many CRBSI episodes would be missed if not all catheter lumens were sampled.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective study (1 January 2003-31 May 2009) in patients with microbiologically proven CRBSI in which all available catheter lumens (those that did not contain clots) were used to draw blood culture samples. We calculated the number of episodes that would have been missed in double- and triple-lumen catheters if the culture of samples obtained from 1 lumens had been eliminated.
RESULTS: We studied 171 episodes of proven CRBSI in 154 patients. Overall, if 1 lumen-associated culture had been eliminated for both double-lumen and triple-lumen catheters, we would have missed 27.2% and 15.8% of episodes of CRBSI, respectively. If we had eliminated 2 cultures for triple-lumen catheters, 37.3% of episodes would have been missed.
CONCLUSIONS: Samples for blood culture should be obtained through all catheter lumens to establish a diagnosis of CRBSI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20455693     DOI: 10.1086/652766

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Infect Dis        ISSN: 1058-4838            Impact factor:   9.079


  13 in total

1.  Differential time to positivity (DTTP) for the diagnosis of catheter-related bloodstream infection: do we need to obtain one or more peripheral vein blood cultures?

Authors:  M Guembe; M Rodríguez-Créixems; C Sánchez-Carrillo; P Martín-Rabadán; E Bouza
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 2.  Novel approaches to the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of medical device-associated infections.

Authors:  Paschalis Vergidis; Robin Patel
Journal:  Infect Dis Clin North Am       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 5.982

3.  Discrepant results from sampling different lumens of multilumen catheters: the case for sampling all lumens.

Authors:  J Cuellar-Rodriguez; D Connor; P Murray; J Gea-Banacloche
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 3.267

4.  Intravascular catheter-related bloodstream infection.

Authors:  Harshal Shah; Wendelyn Bosch; Kristine M Thompson; Walter C Hellinger
Journal:  Neurohospitalist       Date:  2013-07

5.  A comparative assessment of two conservative methods for the diagnosis of catheter-related infection in critically ill patients.

Authors:  John R Gowardman; Paula Jeffries; Melissa Lassig-Smith; Janine Stuart; Paul Jarrett; Renae Deans; Matthew McGrail; Narelle M George; Graeme R Nimmo; Claire M Rickard
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 6.  Practical Guidance for Clinical Microbiology Laboratories: A Comprehensive Update on the Problem of Blood Culture Contamination and a Discussion of Methods for Addressing the Problem

Authors:  Gary V Doern; Karen C Carroll; Daniel J Diekema; Kevin W Garey; Mark E Rupp; Melvin P Weinstein; Daniel J Sexton
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 26.132

7.  Which lumen is the source of catheter-related bloodstream infection in patients with multi-lumen central venous catheters?

Authors:  R Krause; T Valentin; H Salzer; M Hönigl; A Valentin; H Auner; I Zollner-Schwetz
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2012-12-29       Impact factor: 3.553

8.  The comparative accuracy of pooled vs. individual blood culture sampling methods for diagnosis of catheter-related bloodstream infection.

Authors:  Phitphiboon Deawtrakulchai; Surampa Cheawchanwattana; Wantin Sribenjalux; Atibordee Meesing
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2022-07-17       Impact factor: 3.667

Review 9.  A state of the art review on optimal practices to prevent, recognize, and manage complications associated with intravascular devices in the critically ill.

Authors:  Jean-François Timsit; Mark Rupp; Emilio Bouza; Vineet Chopra; Tarja Kärpänen; Kevin Laupland; Thiago Lisboa; Leonard Mermel; Olivier Mimoz; Jean-Jacques Parienti; Garyphalia Poulakou; Bertrand Souweine; Walter Zingg
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-05-12       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 10.  Long-term catheterization: current approaches in the diagnosis and treatment of port-related infections.

Authors:  Cesar Bustos; Aitziber Aguinaga; Francisco Carmona-Torre; Jose Luis Del Pozo
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 4.003

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.