Literature DB >> 20454927

Analysis of overall survival from a phase III study of ixabepilone plus capecitabine versus capecitabine in patients with MBC resistant to anthracyclines and taxanes.

Gabriel N Hortobagyi1, Henry L Gomez, Rubi K Li, Hyun-Cheol Chung, Luis E Fein, Valorie F Chan, Jacek Jassem, Guillermo L Lerzo, Xavier B Pivot, Fernando Hurtado de Mendoza, Binghe Xu, Linda T Vahdat, Ronald A Peck, Pralay Mukhopadhyay, Henri H Roché.   

Abstract

Limited proven treatment options exist for patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) resistant to anthracycline and taxane treatment. Ixabepilone, a novel semisynthetic analog of epothilone B, has demonstrated single-agent activity in MBC resistant to anthracyclines and taxanes. In combination with capecitabine in a phase III trial (CA163-046) in this setting, ixabepilone prolonged progression-free survival and increased objective response rate relative to capecitabine (Thomas et al. J Clin Oncol 25:5210-5217, 2007). Here, we report the results of overall survival (OS), a secondary efficacy endpoint from the CA163-046 trial. Seven hundred fifty-two patients with MBC resistant to anthracyclines and taxanes were randomized to ixabepilone (40 mg/m(2) intravenously on day 1 of a 21-day cycle) plus capecitabine (2,000 mg/m(2) orally on days 1 through 14 of a 21-day cycle) or capecitabine alone (2,500 mg/m(2) on the same schedule). Patients receiving ixabepilone plus capecitabine treatment had a median survival of 12.9 months compared to 11.1 months for patients receiving capecitabine alone (HR = 0.9; 95%CI: 077-1.05; P = 0.19). This observed increase in median OS favored the combination; however, the difference was not statistically significant. Predefined subset analyses showed a clinically meaningful increase in OS in KPS 70-80 patients receiving ixabepilone plus capecitabine (HR = 0.75; 95% CI: 0.58-0.98). Ixabepilone plus capecitabine did not show a significant improvement in survival compared to capecitabine alone in patients with MBC resistant to anthracyclines and taxanes. The observed differences in survival favored the combination arm. A clinical benefit was also seen in patients in the KPS 70-80 subgroup.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20454927     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-010-0901-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  24 in total

Review 1.  Eribulin -- a review of preclinical and clinical studies.

Authors:  Umang Swami; Imran Chaudhary; Mohammad H Ghalib; Sanjay Goel
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 6.312

2.  Weekly ixabepilone administration in heavily pretreated metastatic breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Ellen B Kossoff; Nuttapong Ngamphaiboon; Thomas J Laudico; Tracey L O'Connor
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 3.064

3.  Which patients with metastatic breast cancer benefit from subsequent lines of treatment? An update for clinicians.

Authors:  Raffaella Palumbo; Federico Sottotetti; Alberto Riccardi; Cristina Teragni; Emma Pozzi; Erica Quaquarini; Barbara Tagliaferri; Antonio Bernardo
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 8.168

Review 4.  Systemic treatment approaches in her2-negative advanced breast cancer-guidance on the guidelines.

Authors:  A A Joy; M Ghosh; R Fernandes; M J Clemons
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 5.  Recent developments in treatment stratification for metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Sarah Barton; Charles Swanton
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 6.  A comparison of toxicity profiles between the lower and standard dose capecitabine in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tomohiro F Nishijima; Maya Suzuki; Hyman B Muss
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Chemotherapy and targeted therapy for women with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (or unknown) advanced breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline.

Authors:  Ann H Partridge; R Bryan Rumble; Lisa A Carey; Steven E Come; Nancy E Davidson; Angelo Di Leo; Julie Gralow; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Beverly Moy; Douglas Yee; Shelley B Brundage; Michael A Danso; Maggie Wilcox; Ian E Smith
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 8.  Evolving options for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer: progression-free survival as an endpoint.

Authors:  Sara A Hurvitz
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2011-02-10       Impact factor: 12.111

9.  Bevacizumab in advanced breast cancer: an opportunity as second-line therapy?

Authors:  Fausto Petrelli; Sandro Barni
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2010-12-14       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 10.  Critical appraisal of cabazitaxel in the management of advanced prostate cancer.

Authors:  Sumanta Kumar Pal; Przemyslaw Twardowski; Oliver Sartor
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 4.458

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.