Literature DB >> 2045390

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis. A quantitative analysis of motion, gait, and femoral remodeling after in situ fixation.

D B Siegel1, J R Kasser, P Sponseller, R H Gelberman.   

Abstract

A prospective clinical study was done for quantitative examination of motion of the hip, gait, and proximal femoral remodeling after in situ fixation of a slipped capital femoral epiphysis. In situ fixation was performed in forty-five consecutively treated patients (fifty-six hips). Thirty-nine (87 per cent) of the patients returned for examination two years after treatment. The greatest percentage of motion of the hip returned within six months after treatment. Despite loss of internal rotation of the hip, the mean foot-progression angle was 10.8 degrees. Radiography and computerized tomographic scanning revealed minimum change in the relationship of the femoral head to the femoral shaft and no change in the neck-shaft angle. Motion returned despite minimum osseous remodeling. The early return of motion (in the first three months) may have been due to relief of pain, spasm, and synovitis, while soft-tissue stretching and resorption of bone in the anterolateral part of the femoral neck may have accounted for the remainder of the increase in internal rotation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2045390

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  9 in total

1.  Radiological outcome and gait function of SCFE patients after growth arrest.

Authors:  Bettina Westhoff; Katharina Schröder; Kristina Weimann-Stahlschmidt; Christoph Zilkens; Reinhart Willers; Rüdiger Krauspe
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2013-10-19       Impact factor: 1.548

2.  Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: ultrasonographic findings.

Authors:  A Castriota-Scanderbeg; E Orsi
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Capital realignment for moderate and severe SCFE using a modified Dunn procedure.

Authors:  Kai Ziebarth; Christoph Zilkens; Samantha Spencer; Michael Leunig; Reinhold Ganz; Young-Jo Kim
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  The delay in diagnosis of slipped capital femoral epiphysis: a review of 102 patients.

Authors:  Daniel W Green; Richard A K Reynolds; Safdar N Khan; Vernon Tolo
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2005-09

5.  Range of motion after computed tomography-based simulation of intertrochanteric corrective osteotomy in cases of slipped capital femoral epiphysis: comparison of uniplanar flexion osteotomy and multiplanar flexion, valgisation, and rotational osteotomies.

Authors:  Tallal Charles Mamisch; Young-Jo Kim; Jens Richolt; Christoph Zilkens; Ron Kikinis; Michael Millis; Jens Kordelle
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.324

6.  EVALUATION OF PRESENTATION OF SIGNS AND SYMPTOMS OF FEMOROACETABULAR IMPINGEMENT AFTER EPIPHYSIOLYSIS OF THE PROXIMAL FEMUR.

Authors:  Fábio Peng Krüger; Paulo Sérgio Gérzon de Britto; Lauro Machado Neto; Carlos Roberto Schwartsmann
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2015-12-06

7.  Pinning the slipped and contralateral hips in the treatment of slipped capital femoral epiphysis.

Authors:  G Hägglund
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.548

8.  Diagnosing slipped capital femoral epiphysis amongst various medical specialists.

Authors:  A Lam; S A Boenerjous; Y Lo; J M Abzug; J Kurian; M C Liszewski; D E Sanderson; J M Scholnick; B H Taragin; J A Gomez; N Y Otsuka; R Hanstein
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 1.548

9.  Leg length discrepancy in patients with slipped capital femoral epiphysis.

Authors:  Seung-Ju Kim; Tamir Bloom; Sanjeev Sabharwal
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 3.717

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.