Silvana F Marasco1, Ilija D Sutalo, Anh V Bui. 1. CJOB Cardiothoracic Surgery Department, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. s.marasco@alfred.org.au
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Rib fractures as a result of trauma are a relatively common injury. There is an increasing interest in the operative stabilization of these injuries. Absorbable fixation plates are an option for improved rib fracture treatment. The aim of this study was to review our plating failures and to create a numerical model of muscle forces on fractured ribs to identify the mechanism by which these rib fixations have failed. METHODS: Thirteen patients who had 58 ribs fixed with absorbable prostheses were reviewed. Finite element modeling was used to simulate the fixation of a lateral rib fracture using an absorbable plate and screw system. Internal pressure, intercostal forces, and appropriate displacement and rotational constraints were enforced at the rib ends. RESULTS: Ten rib fixation failures were noted in the clinical series. The modeling results showed that stresses on the plate differ during inspiration and expiration. Failure to use the two central screws resulted in higher stresses on the plating system. During inspiration simulations, the screws on both rib parts are active in keeping the rib and plate surfaces unseparated. However, during expiration, there is a greater stress on the screws on the posterior part of the broken rib, and separation of the plate from the rib seems to be more likely to occur at this site. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that the likely mode of failure of this absorbable plating system occurs on the posterior part of the rib, which correlates with the clinical failures seen.
BACKGROUND: Rib fractures as a result of trauma are a relatively common injury. There is an increasing interest in the operative stabilization of these injuries. Absorbable fixation plates are an option for improved rib fracture treatment. The aim of this study was to review our plating failures and to create a numerical model of muscle forces on fractured ribs to identify the mechanism by which these rib fixations have failed. METHODS: Thirteen patients who had 58 ribs fixed with absorbable prostheses were reviewed. Finite element modeling was used to simulate the fixation of a lateral rib fracture using an absorbable plate and screw system. Internal pressure, intercostal forces, and appropriate displacement and rotational constraints were enforced at the rib ends. RESULTS: Ten rib fixation failures were noted in the clinical series. The modeling results showed that stresses on the plate differ during inspiration and expiration. Failure to use the two central screws resulted in higher stresses on the plating system. During inspiration simulations, the screws on both rib parts are active in keeping the rib and plate surfaces unseparated. However, during expiration, there is a greater stress on the screws on the posterior part of the broken rib, and separation of the plate from the rib seems to be more likely to occur at this site. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that the likely mode of failure of this absorbable plating system occurs on the posterior part of the rib, which correlates with the clinical failures seen.