Literature DB >> 20453635

Two schedules of chemotherapy for patients with non-small cell lung cancer in poor performance status: a phase II randomized trial.

Matjaz Zwitter1, Viljem Kovac, Mirjana Rajer, Martina Vrankar, Uros Smrdel.   

Abstract

We present experience from a phase II randomized clinical trial, comparing standard gemcitabine as monotherapy with low-dose gemcitabine in long infusion in a doublet with cisplatin at reduced dose for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and who are unfit for standard platin-based chemotherapy. Eligible patients had microscopically confirmed NSCLC in stage IIIB (wet) or IV, were chemo-naive, and were in poor performance status or presented with significant comorbidity. Standard treatment with gemcitabine, 1250 mg/m in 20-30 min on days 1 and 8 as monotherapy (arm A) was compared with low-dose gemcitabine in long infusion (200 mg/m in 6 h on day 1) and cisplatin at 60 mg/m on day 2 (arm B). Both treatment schedules were repeated every 3 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or to a maximum of six cycles. A total of 112 patients (83 male, 29 female, median age 66 years) were randomized between arm A (57 patients) and B (55 patients). The two groups were balanced for prognostic factors. Fifty-three patients in arm A and 52 in arm B received at least one application of chemotherapy and were evaluable for toxicity and response. The median number of cycles was four and five for arms A and B, respectively. Except for grade 3 anemia (one patient in arm A and two in arm B), no other major toxicity was seen. Regarding response to treatment, arm B was superior: 1 complete response and 13 partial remissions (response rate 26.9%) as compared with five partial remissions (response rate 9.4%) in arm A (P<0.01). The median time to progression was 3.8 and 5.6 months, and the median survival was 4.3 and 6.8 months for arms A and B, respectively (P<0.05). Treatment with low-dose gemcitabine in long infusion and cisplatin at reduced dose has very low toxicity, is effective, was found to be superior to monotherapy with gemcitabine in standard doses, and is suitable for patients with NSCLC who cannot tolerate a standard platin-based doublet.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20453635     DOI: 10.1097/CAD.0b013e32833ab7a0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anticancer Drugs        ISSN: 0959-4973            Impact factor:   2.248


  13 in total

Review 1.  Factors affecting efficacy and safety of add-on combination chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer: a literature-based pooled analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Kouichi Inoue; Mamoru Narukawa; Masahiro Takeuchi
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 2.584

Review 2.  Health-related quality of life in non-small-cell lung cancer: an update of a systematic review on methodologic issues in randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Lily Claassens; Jan van Meerbeeck; Corneel Coens; Chantal Quinten; Irina Ghislain; Elizabeth K Sloan; Xin Shelly Wang; Galina Velikova; Andrew Bottomley
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-04-04       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Results of platinum-based chemotherapy in unselected performance status (PS) 2 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a cohort study.

Authors:  Stéphane Jouveshomme; Florence Canoui-Poitrine; Aurélie Le Thuaut; Sylvie Bastuji-Garin
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 4.  Chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer in the elderly population.

Authors:  Fábio N Santos; Tiago B de Castria; Marcelo R S Cruz; Rachel Riera
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-10-20

5.  Induction gemcitabine in standard dose or prolonged low-dose with cisplatin followed by concurrent radiochemotherapy in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a randomized phase II clinical trial.

Authors:  Martina Vrankar; Matjaz Zwitter; Tanja Bavcar; Ana Milic; Viljem Kovac
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 2.991

6.  Bevacizumab plus chemotherapy in elderly patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer: single center experience.

Authors:  Janja Ocvirk; Maja Ebert Moltara; Tanja Mesti; Marko Boc; Martina Rebersek; Neva Volk; Jernej Benedik; Zvezdana Hlebanja
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2016-04-23       Impact factor: 2.991

7.  Meta-analysis of gemcitabine in brief versus prolonged low-dose infusion for advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Zhao Dehua; Chu Mingming; Wang Jisheng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Prolonged low-dose infusion for gemcitabine: a systematic review.

Authors:  Dehua Zhao; Jing Chen; Mingming Chu; Jisheng Wang
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Phase III Non-inferiority Study Evaluating Efficacy and Safety of Low Dose Gemcitabine Compared to Standard Dose Gemcitabine With Platinum in Advanced Squamous Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Vijay Patil; Vanita Noronha; Amit Joshi; Anuradha Chougule; Sadhana Kannan; Atanu Bhattacharjee; Supriya Goud; Sucheta More; Arun Chandrasekharan; Nandini Menon; Sujay Srinivas; Dilip Harindran Vallathol; Hollis Dsouza; Swaratika Majumdar; Sudeep Das; Abhinav Zawar; Satvik Khaddar; Amit Kumar; Gunjesh Singh; Kanteti Aditya Pavan Kumar; Rahul Ravind; Vaishakhi Trivedi; Vichitra Behel; Abhishek Mahajan; Amit Janu; Nilendu Purandare; Kumar Prabhash
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2019-04-09

10.  Improved survival after introduction of chemotherapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma in Slovenia: Population-based survey of 444 patients.

Authors:  Viljem Kovac; Matjaz Zwitter; Tina Zagar
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 2.991

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.