| Literature DB >> 20452885 |
Alexander A Hanke1, A Staib, K Görlinger, M Perrey, D Dirkmann, P Kienbaum.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Serious thrombembolic events occur in otherwise healthy marathon athletes during competition. We tested the hypothesis that during heavy endurance sports coagulation and platelets are activated depending on the type of endurance sport with respect to its running fraction.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20452885 PMCID: PMC3352046 DOI: 10.1186/2047-783x-15-2-59
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Med Res ISSN: 0949-2321 Impact factor: 2.175
Demographic data of study participants
| Marathon | Triathlon | Cycling | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 43 ± 8.4 | 36.5 ± 6.3 | 41.7 ± 12.2 | 0.0429 * |
| Physical activity (hours/week) | 7.9 ± 9.3 | 11.1 ± 5.0 | 12.2 ± 9.8 | 0.2081 |
| Hemoglobin before (g/l) | 15.0 ± 0.8 | 15.7 ± 0.9 | 15.1 ± 1.2 | 0.1281 |
| Hemoglobin after (g/l) | 15.2 ± 0.7 | 15.5 ± 0.9 | 15.5 ± 1.6 | 0.9234 |
| Platelets before (μl-1) | 239.3 ± 36.5 | 224.5 ± 43.2 | 250.1 ± 62.4 | 0.6103 |
| Platelets after (μl-1l) | 286.0 ± 42.5 # | 261.3 ± 51.6 # | 247.9 ± 62.4 | 0.0650 |
| Leucocytes before competition (μl-1) | 5.3 ± 1.0 | 5.9 ± 1.1 | 5.5 ± 1.2 | 0.2331 |
| Leucocytes after competition (μl-1l) | 16.8 ± 3.2 # | 16.6 ± 3.8 # | 11.4 ± 3.2# | < 0.0001 * |
Data are displayed as mean ± standard deviation. p < 0.05.
Figure 1Results of rotational thrombelastometry after intrinsically activation before and after competition. Maximum clot firmness (MCF) significantly increased in all groups (left panel). Clotting times (CT) significantly decreased in all groups (right panel). * p < 0.05.
Results of Thrombelastometry (ROTEM®) and impedance aggregometry (Multiplate®) before and after competition
| Marathon | Triathlon | Cycling | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CT INTEM before (s) | 172 ± 15.3 | 168.1 ± 12.9 | 164.7 ± 17.7 | 0.3956 |
| CT INTEM after (s) | 155 ± 18.3 # | 154.2 ± 11.3 # | 152.5 ± 13.0 # | 0.9255 |
| MCF INTEM before (mm) | 58.1 ± 3.9 | 56.1 ± 3.2 | 59.3 ± 5.0 | 0.0823 |
| MCF INTEM after (mm) | 62.4 ± 3.8 # | 59.5 ± 3.1 # | 64.2 ± 4.2 # | 0.0013 * |
| MCF FIBTEM before (mm) | 10.9 ± 2.7 | 8.9 ± 2.8 | 9.6 ± 3 | 0.0928 |
| MCF FIBTEM after (mm) | 12.5 ± 3 # | 9.9 ± 2.4 # | 11.3 ± 2.4 # | 0.0136 * |
| AUC TRAP activation before (g/l) | 899 ± 149 | 911 ± 233 | 970 ± 186 | 0.4672 |
| AUC TRAP activation after (g/l) | 1041 ± 209 # | 1009 ± 315 | 906 ± 288 | 0.3492 |
| AUC ADP activation before (g/l) | 529 ± 174 | 508 ± 178 | 589 ± 160 | 0.1281 |
| AUC ADP activation after (g/l) | 795 ± 258 # | 800 ± 320 # | 627 ± 219 | 0.0865 |
Data are displayed as mean ± standard deviation. (p < 0.05) Note, that results, obtained by thrombelastometry, show a significant increase of clot stability and shortening of coagulation times, while platelet aggregation is increased only in MAR and TRI after ADP activation, respectively in MAR after TRAP activation, but not in CYC. (* mark significant differences between groups, # mark significant differences as compared to baseline values)
Figure 2Maximum clot firmness in fibrin polymerization before and after competition as assessed by rotational thrombelastometry (FIBTEM assay). Results significantly increased in all groups. * p < 0.05.
Figure 3Results of platelet aggregation after stimulation by adenosine-di-phosphat (ADP, left panel) and thrombin activating peptide 6 (TRAP, right panel) as assessed by multiple platelet function analysis before and after competition. Note, that significant increases between pre and post competition (* p < 0.05t) are found in marathon after ADP and TRAP activation and in triathlon after ADP activation only, indicating that platelet activation during prolonged activity is dependent on its running fraction.