OBJECTIVES: The adult response to myocardial infarction results in inflammation, scar formation, left ventricular dilatation, and loss of regional and global function. Regenerative scarless healing has been demonstrated in foetal dermis and tendon and is associated with diminished inflammation. We hypothesised that following foetal myocardial infarction, there would be minimal inflammation, regenerative healing, and preservation of function. METHODS: Anteroapical myocardial infarction encompassing 20% of the left ventricle was created in adult or early gestation foetal sheep. Myocardial function was serially assessed using quantitative echocardiography. Infarct architecture was examined histologically for evidence of scar formation. Cellular inflammation, cellular proliferation, and apoptosis were assessed using immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: In the adult sheep 4 weeks following myocardial infarction, there was a significant decline in ejection fraction (EF) (41±7.4% to 26±7.4%, p<0.05), and the akinetic myocardial segment increased in size (6.9±0.8 cm to 7.9±1.1 cm, p<0.05). By contrast, there was no decline in the foetal EF (53±8.1% to 55±8.8%) and no akinetic foetal myocardial segment 4 weeks post-infarction. The foetal infarcts lacked an inflammatory cell infiltrate and healed with minimal fibrosis, compared with the adults. Foetal infarcts also demonstrated 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine (BrdU)+ proliferating cells, including cardiomyocytes, within the infarct. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that the foetal response to myocardial infarction is dramatically different from the adult and is characterised by minimal inflammation, lack of fibrosis, myocardial proliferation and restoration of cardiac function. Diminished inflammation is associated with foetal regenerative cardiac healing following injury. Understanding the mechanisms involved in foetal myocardial regeneration may lead to applications to alter the adult response following myocardial infarction.
OBJECTIVES: The adult response to myocardial infarction results in inflammation, scar formation, left ventricular dilatation, and loss of regional and global function. Regenerative scarless healing has been demonstrated in foetal dermis and tendon and is associated with diminished inflammation. We hypothesised that following foetal myocardial infarction, there would be minimal inflammation, regenerative healing, and preservation of function. METHODS: Anteroapical myocardial infarction encompassing 20% of the left ventricle was created in adult or early gestation foetal sheep. Myocardial function was serially assessed using quantitative echocardiography. Infarct architecture was examined histologically for evidence of scar formation. Cellular inflammation, cellular proliferation, and apoptosis were assessed using immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: In the adult sheep 4 weeks following myocardial infarction, there was a significant decline in ejection fraction (EF) (41±7.4% to 26±7.4%, p<0.05), and the akinetic myocardial segment increased in size (6.9±0.8 cm to 7.9±1.1 cm, p<0.05). By contrast, there was no decline in the foetal EF (53±8.1% to 55±8.8%) and no akinetic foetal myocardial segment 4 weeks post-infarction. The foetal infarcts lacked an inflammatory cell infiltrate and healed with minimal fibrosis, compared with the adults. Foetal infarcts also demonstrated 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine (BrdU)+ proliferating cells, including cardiomyocytes, within the infarct. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that the foetal response to myocardial infarction is dramatically different from the adult and is characterised by minimal inflammation, lack of fibrosis, myocardial proliferation and restoration of cardiac function. Diminished inflammation is associated with foetal regenerative cardiac healing following injury. Understanding the mechanisms involved in foetal myocardial regeneration may lead to applications to alter the adult response following myocardial infarction.
Authors: Daniel Levy; Satish Kenchaiah; Martin G Larson; Emelia J Benjamin; Michelle J Kupka; Kalon K L Ho; Joanne M Murabito; Ramachandran S Vasan Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-10-31 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: N S Adzick; M R Harrison; P L Glick; J H Beckstead; R L Villa; H Scheuenstuhl; W H Goodson Journal: J Pediatr Surg Date: 1985-08 Impact factor: 2.545
Authors: Padma Kaul; Paul W Armstrong; Wei-Ching Chang; C David Naylor; Christopher B Granger; Kerry L Lee; Eric D Peterson; Robert M Califf; Eric J Topol; Daniel B Mark Journal: Circulation Date: 2004-09-20 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Jörg-Detlef Drenckhahn; Quenten P Schwarz; Stephen Gray; Adrienne Laskowski; Helen Kiriazis; Ziqiu Ming; Richard P Harvey; Xiao-Jun Du; David R Thorburn; Timothy C Cox Journal: Dev Cell Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 12.270
Authors: Liying Wang; James M Antonini; Yon Rojanasakul; Vincent Castranova; James F Scabilloni; Robert R Mercer Journal: J Cell Physiol Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 6.384
Authors: Pedro K Beredjiklian; Michele Favata; Jeffrey S Cartmell; Colleen L Flanagan; Timothy M Crombleholme; Louis J Soslowsky Journal: Ann Biomed Eng Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 3.934
Authors: Hugo R Caires; Tiago Esteves; Pedro Quelhas; Mário A Barbosa; Melba Navarro; Catarina R Almeida Journal: J R Soc Interface Date: 2016-09 Impact factor: 4.118
Authors: Carlos Zgheib; Myron W Allukian; Junwang Xu; Michael W Morris; Robert C Caskey; Benjamin J Herdrich; Junyi Hu; Joseph H Gorman; Robert C Gorman; Kenneth W Liechty Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Mitchell C Lock; Ross L Tellam; Kimberley J Botting; Kimberley C W Wang; Joseph B Selvanayagam; Doug A Brooks; Mike Seed; Janna L Morrison Journal: J Physiol Date: 2018-06-28 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: Myron Allukian; Junwang Xu; Michael Morris; Robert Caskey; Wanda Dorsett-Martin; Theodore Plappert; Michael Griswold; Joseph H Gorman; Robert C Gorman; Kenneth W Liechty Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2013-07 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Mitchell C Lock; Ross L Tellam; Jack R T Darby; Jia Yin Soo; Doug A Brooks; Christopher K Macgowan; Joseph B Selvanayagam; Enzo R Porrello; Mike Seed; Maureen Keller-Wood; Janna L Morrison Journal: Physiol Genomics Date: 2020-01-21 Impact factor: 3.107
Authors: Eileen I Chang; Paul J Rozance; Stephanie R Wesolowski; Leanna M Nguyen; Steven C Shaw; Robert A Sclafani; Kristen K Bjorkman; Angela K Peter; William Hay; Laura D Brown Journal: J Endocrinol Date: 2019-12-19 Impact factor: 4.286
Authors: Junwang Xu; Wenjie Wu; Liping Zhang; Wanda Dorset-Martin; Michael W Morris; Marc E Mitchell; Kenneth W Liechty Journal: Diabetes Date: 2012-07-30 Impact factor: 9.461