Literature DB >> 20452053

Patient participation in antipsychotic drug choice decisions.

Johannes Hamann1, Joachim Kruse, Florian S Schmitz, Werner Kissling, Frank-Gerald Pajonk.   

Abstract

Patient inclusion in antipsychotic drug decisions is recommended by international treatment guidelines. For N=300 in patients with schizophrenia, we analysed patients' preferences for inclusion in decisions and physicians' estimates which patients actually participated in drug choice. Path analysis was used to examine the relationships between patients' preferences/actual participation and clinical variables measured. Forty percent of the patients expressed a wish to participate in clinical decisions. Those patients wishing to participate in medical decisions had less insight into the necessity of treatment. Psychiatrists gave better ratings of the doctor-patient relationship to those patients whom they rated as having participated in their drug choice. These patients had more positive attitudes towards antipsychotic medication. There was no relationship between the desire to participate and actual participation in the drug choice. When working with patients exhibiting poor insight and negative drug attitudes, psychiatrists use authoritative decision-making styles despite the patient's desire to participate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20452053     DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2008.08.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatry Res        ISSN: 0165-1781            Impact factor:   3.222


  8 in total

1.  How are patient-related characteristics associated with shared decision-making about treatment? A scoping review of quantitative studies.

Authors:  Sascha M Keij; Joyce E de Boer; Anne M Stiggelbout; Wändi Bruine de Bruin; Ellen Peters; Saïda Moaddine; Marleen Kunneman; Arwen H Pieterse
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 3.006

2.  Shared decision-making in mental health care-A user perspective on decisional needs in community-based services.

Authors:  Katarina Grim; David Rosenberg; Petra Svedberg; Ulla-Karin Schön
Journal:  Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being       Date:  2016-05-09

3.  Psychiatric service staff perceptions of implementing a shared decision-making tool: a process evaluation study.

Authors:  Ulla-Karin Schön; Katarina Grim; Lars Wallin; David Rosenberg; Petra Svedberg
Journal:  Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being       Date:  2018-12

4.  Involvement of people with schizophrenia in decision-making in rural Ethiopia: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Sally Souraya; Charlotte Hanlon; Laura Asher
Journal:  Global Health       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 4.185

5.  Development of a Strategic Tool for Shared Decision-Making in the Use of Antidepressants among Patients with Major Depressive Disorder: A Focus Group Study.

Authors:  Syahrir Zaini; Harvin Anbu Manivanna Bharathy; Ahmad Hatim Sulaiman; Jesjeet Singh Gill; Koh Ong Hui; Hasniza Zaman Huri; Siti Hadijah Shamsudin; Ng Chong Guan
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Co-creating a process of user involvement and shared decision-making in coordinated care planning with users and caregivers in social services.

Authors:  Ola Knutsson; Ulla-Karin Schön
Journal:  Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being       Date:  2020-12

7.  Pharmaceutical care and medication adherence in management of psychosis in a Nigerian tertiary hospital.

Authors:  Jonathan Danladi; Kakjing D Falang; Raymond A Barde; Nanlok S Jimam; Dauda A Dangiwa; Hafsat O Jimoh
Journal:  J Res Pharm Pract       Date:  2013-04

8.  Confirming mental health care in acute psychiatric wards, as narrated by persons experiencing psychotic illness: an interview study.

Authors:  Karina Sebergsen; Astrid Norberg; Anne-Grethe Talseth
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2016-01-13
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.