Richard A Watson1, Nihirika Suchak, Knight Steel. 1. Department of Urology and Geriatrics, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ 07601-8554, USA. rwatson@humed.com
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To establish a rationale for providing on-site urological care on a regular basis in the nursing health care center setting and to share "lessons learned," which we have garnered in providing that care over a 5-year experience. METHODS: We have reviewed and assessed our experiences in providing urological outreach to nursing health care center patients. RESULTS: Our outreach program has been well received both by patients and by health care center personnel. Over this time, we have capitalized on many advantages that this initiative offers, and we have gained, through this experience, several "lessons learned," not only regarding what to do, but also what to avoid. CONCLUSIONS: Advantages to on-site urological care include: (1) timely, targeted clinical intervention; (2) significant disease prevention; (3) expedition of treatment; (4) health care provider education; and (5) rich opportunities for clinical investigation. In addition, the on-site urologist can provide the health care center with helpful advice and validation in meeting federal and state health care requirements. Unfortunately, to date, remuneration for such programs has been discouraging. Federal and state regulations continue to impede innovative change. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
OBJECTIVES: To establish a rationale for providing on-site urological care on a regular basis in the nursing health care center setting and to share "lessons learned," which we have garnered in providing that care over a 5-year experience. METHODS: We have reviewed and assessed our experiences in providing urological outreach to nursing health care center patients. RESULTS: Our outreach program has been well received both by patients and by health care center personnel. Over this time, we have capitalized on many advantages that this initiative offers, and we have gained, through this experience, several "lessons learned," not only regarding what to do, but also what to avoid. CONCLUSIONS: Advantages to on-site urological care include: (1) timely, targeted clinical intervention; (2) significant disease prevention; (3) expedition of treatment; (4) health care provider education; and (5) rich opportunities for clinical investigation. In addition, the on-site urologist can provide the health care center with helpful advice and validation in meeting federal and state health care requirements. Unfortunately, to date, remuneration for such programs has been discouraging. Federal and state regulations continue to impede innovative change. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: Ove Spreckelsen; Guido Schmiemann; Alexander Maximilian Fassmer; Bettina Engel; Falk Hoffmann; Michael Hermann Freitag Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-09-29 Impact factor: 3.390