Literature DB >> 20451930

The impact of bridge-to-transplant ventricular assist device support on survival after cardiac transplantation.

David A Bull1, Bruce B Reid, Craig H Selzman, Rebecca Mesley, Stavros Drakos, Steven Clayson, Greg Stoddard, Edward Gilbert, Josef Stehlik, Feras Bader, Abdallah Kfoury, Deborah Budge, David D Eckels, Anne Fuller, Dale Renlund, Amit N Patel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of bridge-to-transplant ventricular assist device support on survival after cardiac transplantation.
METHODS: From January 1, 1993, to April 30, 2009, a total of 525 cardiac transplants were performed. Ventricular assist devices were placed as a bridge to transplant in 110 patients. We focused our analysis on the 2 most common causes of end-stage heart failure requiring transplantation: idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (n = 201) and coronary artery disease (n = 213). Data including gender, age, date of transplant, cause of heart failure, prior heart transplant, placement of a ventricular assist device, type of ventricular assist device, and panel-reactive antibody sensitization were analyzed to derive Kaplan-Meier survival probabilities and multivariable Cox regression models.
RESULTS: In patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy who received a ventricular assist device as a bridge to transplant, survival was decreased at 1 year (P = .008) and 5 years (P = .019), but not at 10 years, posttransplant. In patients with coronary artery disease, the use of a ventricular assist device as a bridge to transplant did not influence survival at 1, 5, and 10 tears posttransplant. In patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy who received a Heartmate I (Thoratec Corp, Pleasanton, Calif) ventricular assist device as a bridge to a cardiac transplant, elevation in the pretransplant panel-reactive antibody correlated with a decrease in long-term survival.
CONCLUSION: In patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, placement of a Heartmate I ventricular assist device as a bridge to a cardiac transplant is associated with an elevation in the pretransplant panel-reactive antibody and a decrease in 1- and 5-year survivals after cardiac transplantation. 2010 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20451930     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.03.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  5 in total

1.  Effect of sensitization in US heart transplant recipients bridged with a ventricular assist device: update in a modern cohort.

Authors:  George J Arnaoutakis; Timothy J George; Arman Kilic; Eric S Weiss; Stuart D Russell; John V Conte; Ashish S Shah
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 2.  [Indications and strategies in mechanical circulatory support : Rise of the machines?]

Authors:  A Dashkevich; S Michel; C Hagl
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 0.840

3.  Influence of durable mechanical circulatory support and allosensitization on mortality after heart transplantation.

Authors:  Peter Chiu; Justin M Schaffer; Philip E Oyer; Michael Pham; Dipanjan Banerjee; Y Joseph Woo; Richard Ha
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 10.247

4.  Ventricular assist devices or inotropic agents in status 1A patients? Survival analysis of the United Network of Organ Sharing database.

Authors:  Curtis J Wozniak; Josef Stehlik; Bradley C Baird; Stephen H McKellar; Howard K Song; Stavros G Drakos; Craig H Selzman
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2014-01-11       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Donor predictors of allograft use and recipient outcomes after heart transplantation.

Authors:  Kiran K Khush; Rebecca Menza; John Nguyen; Jonathan G Zaroff; Benjamin A Goldstein
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 8.790

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.