Literature DB >> 20451344

Long-term safety and efficacy of stenting versus coronary artery bypass grafting for unprotected left main coronary artery disease: 5-year results from the MAIN-COMPARE (Revascularization for Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis: Comparison of Percutaneous Coronary Angioplasty Versus Surgical Revascularization) registry.

Duk-Woo Park1, Ki Bae Seung, Young-Hak Kim, Jong-Young Lee, Won-Jang Kim, Soo-Jin Kang, Seung-Whan Lee, Cheol Whan Lee, Seong-Wook Park, Sung-Cheol Yun, Hyeon-Cheol Gwon, Myung-Ho Jeong, Yang-Soo Jang, Hyo-Soo Kim, Pum Joon Kim, In-Whan Seong, Hun Sik Park, Taehoon Ahn, In-Ho Chae, Seung-Jea Tahk, Wook-Sung Chung, Seung-Jung Park.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We performed the long-term follow-up of a large cohort of patients in a multicenter study receiving left main coronary artery (LMCA) revascularization.
BACKGROUND: Limited information is available on long-term outcomes for patients with unprotected LMCA disease who underwent coronary stent procedure or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).
METHODS: We evaluated 2,240 patients with unprotected LMCA disease who received coronary stents (n = 1,102; 318 with bare-metal stents and 784 with drug-eluting stents) or underwent CABG (n = 1,138) between 2000 and 2006 and for whom complete follow-up data were available for at least 3 to 9 years (median 5.2 years). The 5-year adverse outcomes (death; a composite outcome of death, Q-wave myocardial infarction [MI], or stroke; and target vessel revascularization [TVR]) were compared with the use of the inverse probability of treatment weighted method and propensity-score matching.
RESULTS: After adjustment for differences in baseline risk factors with the inverse probability of treatment weighting, the 5-year risk of death (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.88 to 1.44, p = 0.35) and the combined risk of death, Q-wave MI, or stroke (HR: 1.07; 95% CI: 0.84 to 1.37, p = 0.59) were not significantly different for patients undergoing stenting versus CABG. The risk of TVR was significantly higher in the stenting group than in the CABG group (HR: 5.11; 95% CI: 3.52 to 7.42, p < 0.001). Similar results were obtained in comparisons of bare-metal stent with concurrent CABG and of drug-eluting stent with concurrent CABG. In further analysis with propensity-score matching, overall findings were consistent.
CONCLUSIONS: During 5-year follow-up, stenting showed similar rates of mortality and of the composite of death, Q-wave MI, or stroke but higher rates of TVR as compared with CABG for patients with unprotected LMCA disease. Copyright 2010 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20451344     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.04.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  50 in total

1.  Bypass surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention for the treatment of unprotected left main disease. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  S Desch; E Boudriot; A Rastan; P E Buszman; A Bochenek; F W Mohr; G Schuler; H Thiele
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2012-03-11       Impact factor: 1.443

2.  Combination of angiographic and clinical characteristics for the prediction of clinical outcomes in patients undergoing unprotected left main coronary artery stenting.

Authors:  Jan-Malte Sinning; Viktoria Stoffel; Eberhard Grube; Georg Nickenig; Nikos Werner
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 3.  Revascularization for left main and multivessel coronary artery disease in the drug-eluting stent era: integration of recent drug-eluting stent trials.

Authors:  Samip Vasaiwala; David O Williams
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.931

4.  Probable endothelisation of bare metal stent struts extending from the left main coronary into the aorta.

Authors:  H Zreiqat; C-Y Yang; B James; J Duflou; H C Lowe
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.300

5.  2014 ACC/AHA guideline on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and management of patients undergoing noncardiac surgery: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines. Developed in collaboration with the American College of Surgeons, American Society of Anesthesiologists, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Rhythm Society, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, and Society of Vascular Medicine Endorsed by the Society of Hospital Medicine.

Authors:  Lee A Fleisher; Kirsten E Fleischmann; Andrew D Auerbach; Susan A Barnason; Joshua A Beckman; Biykem Bozkurt; Victor G Davila-Roman; Marie D Gerhard-Herman; Thomas A Holly; Garvan C Kane; Joseph E Marine; M Timothy Nelson; Crystal C Spencer; Annemarie Thompson; Henry H Ting; Barry F Uretsky; Duminda N Wijeysundera
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 6.  Surgical versus percutaneous revascularization in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Piroze M Davierwala; Freidrich W Mohr
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 7.  Stenting versus surgery for significant left main disease.

Authors:  Ralf E Harskamp; Duk-Woo Park
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.931

8.  "You don't need a weather man to know which way the wind blows": understanding differences and applications in clinical practice of randomized controlled trials on unprotected left main.

Authors:  Fabrizio D'Ascenzo; Ovidio De Filippo; Maurizio Bertaina; Mario Iannaccone; Fiorenzo Gaita
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-02

9.  Very long-term follow-up for left main coronary artery stenting: a missing piece of the jigsaw puzzle.

Authors:  Yalcin Velibey; Tolga Sinan Guvenc; Ahmet Taha Alper
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 10.  Optimal revascularization for complex coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Javaid Iqbal; Patrick W Serruys; David P Taggart
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 32.419

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.