Literature DB >> 2045133

Glucagon and clonidine testing in the diagnosis of pheochromocytoma.

E Grossman1, D S Goldstein, A Hoffman, H R Keiser.   

Abstract

We assessed the sensitivity and specificity of glucagon stimulation and clonidine suppression tests in the diagnosis of pheochromocytoma in 113 hypertensive patients, 39 with and 74 without the tumor. In the glucagon stimulation test, blood was sampled 2 minutes after intravenous injection of 0.28 mumol (1 mg) glucagon, and in the clonidine suppression test, blood was sampled 3 hours after administration of oral clonidine, 1.30 mumol (0.3 mg)/70 kg body wt. Baseline levels of catechols in antecubital venous blood were abnormal, with norepinephrine greater than 7.10 nmol/l (1,200 pg/m), epinephrine greater than 1.51 nmol/l (276 pg/ml), norepinephrine/dihydroxyphenylglycol (DHPG) ratio greater than 1.09, or dopa greater than 35.53 nmol/l (7,000 pg/ml), in 30 of 39 patients with pheochromocytoma (sensitivity 77%) and 1 of 74 patients without pheochromocytoma (specificity 99%). Results of the glucagon test were abnormal (norepinephrine greater than 11.83 nmol/l [2,000 pg/ml] or more than threefold increase from baseline) in 25 of 31 patients with pheochromocytoma (sensitivity 81%) and 0 of 72 patients without pheochromocytoma (specificity 100%). Results of the clonidine test were abnormal (after clonidine norepinephrine greater than 2.96 nmol/l [500 pg/ml] or less than 50% decrease from baseline) in 29 of 30 patients with pheochromocytoma (sensitivity 97%) and in 7 of 30 patients without pheochromocytoma (specificity 67%). Very high baseline levels of catechols therefore indicated the presence of pheochromocytoma, but there were several false-negative results when normal levels were obtained. The glucagon test alone was highly specific but not sensitive, and the clonidine test was highly sensitive but less specific.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2045133     DOI: 10.1161/01.hyp.17.6.733

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertension        ISSN: 0194-911X            Impact factor:   10.190


  18 in total

1.  Hypertension in patients with pheochromocytoma.

Authors:  N N Hanna; D E Kenady
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 2.  Neurocardiology: therapeutic implications for cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  David S Goldstein
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ther       Date:  2010-11-25       Impact factor: 3.023

3.  A pheochromocytoma with normal clonidine-suppression test: how difficult the biochemical diagnosis?

Authors:  Michelangelo Sartori; Alessandro Cosenzi; Elena Bernobich; Lorenzo A Calo; Giuseppe Bellini; Andrea Semplicini
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2008-02-09       Impact factor: 3.397

4.  Catecholamines 101.

Authors:  David S Goldstein
Journal:  Clin Auton Res       Date:  2010-07-11       Impact factor: 4.435

5.  Unusual clinical manifestation of pheochromocytoma in a MEN2A patient.

Authors:  M Guerrieri; S Filipponi; G Arnaldi; M Giovagnetti; E Lezoche; F Mantero; A Taccaliti
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.256

6.  Phaeochromocytoma: a catecholamine and oxidative stress disorder.

Authors:  K Pacak
Journal:  Endocr Regul       Date:  2011-04

Review 7.  Choice of biochemical test for diagnosis of pheochromocytoma: validation of plasma metanephrines.

Authors:  Graeme Eisenhofer; Jacques W M Lenders; Karel Pacak
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.369

8.  Pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma.

Authors:  Vitaly Kantorovich; Karel Pacak
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.453

9.  Measurement of urinary metanephrines to screen for pheochromocytoma in an unselected hospital referral population.

Authors:  Keith L Brain; Jonathan Kay; Brian Shine
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2006-09-21       Impact factor: 8.327

10.  Low sensitivity of glucagon provocative testing for diagnosis of pheochromocytoma.

Authors:  Jacques W M Lenders; Karel Pacak; Thanh-Truc Huynh; Yehonatan Sharabi; Massimo Mannelli; Gennady Bratslavsky; David S Goldstein; Stefan R Bornstein; Graeme Eisenhofer
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2009-11-06       Impact factor: 5.958

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.